AI or Real? - sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
1.[https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/9cddfb9a-c728-4347-8878-62b7227dd595.png] 2. [https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/2915f7be-9796-48d0-8f11-b8b232ab6fb2.jpeg] 3. [https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/4392c5d4-9f09-4145-a38a-19aa412cfc39.png] 4. [https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/c205f65d-912d-47c1-a009-f544846cf0e1.jpeg] 5. [https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/d585901c-697b-4b45-b107-2f7f084f4905.png] 6. [https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/96b782b7-0e65-42c3-b786-1e1c6e69a5dc.jpeg]

Many people were spot on, and others not as much. All in all I found it fascinating and a lot of fun. Here are the answers:

0. REAL

1. AI

2. REAL

3. AI

4. REAL

5. AI

6. REAL

  • lad@programming.devEnglish
    2·
    7 months ago

    Still, that’s very apparent on large ad posters Apple used to make “shot with an iPhone”, a zoomed in photo looks like it consists of irregular patches of solid colour, not pixels. That’s what I called upscaling, that’s what my old Honour used to do to photos when it fell flat on actually capturing the details, and maybe that’s what others meant, too.

      • lad@programming.devEnglish
        1·
        7 months ago

        On these I would’ve guessed only 1 or 1+2, but since you said that the photos in the post were shot on the iPhone, and there is a preview that shows that the third is a photo from the post, I expect that I’m wrong.

        But yes, the third zoom-in is what I expect to see on a low postprocessing camera, and the first photo is more or less what I imagine from a high postprocessing camera.

          • lad@programming.devEnglish
            2·
            7 months ago

            No big deal with the crop, you were right that the third doesn’t look like what I had in mind. Most likely I’m not informed enough on what iPhones use for photo improvements, maybe I will read something about that