• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              8 months ago

              Good one. The argument is still bullshit that disregards the agency of independent states to freely associate with whomever they choose.

              • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                it also disregards the fact russia dont want to be crushed by the us without a fight. putin aint a saint but come on

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Instead of this"provoking" I assume NATO should have simply attacked instead? You know, like Russia did over and over again?

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            no, NATO/US should have not provoked, simple as.

            russia wanted to join NATO over and over for years.

            • Eheran@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Provoke how?

              What about Russias multiple attacks?

              When did Russia ever say they want to join NATO?

              • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                ex-nato head said they wanted to over and over again when putin got to power, in the early 2000s, im sure they kept trying for a while. i vaguely remember news about this at the time.

                russias multiple attacks came much much later when it became clear they were actually hostile to russia, and because moscow is in a pretty delicate, difficult to defend location, before the aral mountains. even the soviets had this in mind, almost a century ago.

                damn, the cia knew war on ukraine would eventually happen if they kept pushing by, like, the late 2000s or something? i’m not sure on the timeline on this one.

                  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    if we are bringing other small and unrelated conflicts, perhaps this might give an idea of why russia would be hesitant to let NATO/US do whatever they please around them.

                    i suggest you look up the cia involvement i mentioned for more details on your original question though.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Clearly if Ukraine didn’t want to be invaded they shouldn’t have dressed like that