Hi guys! Is there any smart gallery app that can help tag/search the gallery pictures through automatically created tags, such as objects/things recognized in the pictures, locations etc? This is a rather convenient feature in some apple and samsung phones, which I think would be nice to have…But I reckon must consume some CPU/battery. I’d still want it scanning the gallery from time to time, if it was a private local process.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Like others suggested, immich might be able to solve the use case - it just means you have to sync your photos to immich for the server to index the photos. Then in the app you can search for any recognized objects / locations / etc so from your phone it works about the same as Google photos search. Like I can search beach or cat or whatever from my phone and find all of those photos, and it’s private since it’s self hosted.

    I run immich on my nas so it does both photo backup and provides a nice high performance searchable app / web UI to browse and organize photos into albums. It also does private face recognition and tags people, which are searchable too (the most recent app update actually just brought advanced search to the mobile app) so you can select john doe under the people filters and search fish and up comes only pictures of john showing off fish he caught.

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks! A question though…does that mean that the pictures need to be stored cloud-only? I’d like to keep the bulk of them on the phone on local storage. Or how does it work?

      Thanks for the recommendation…I’m tempted to get my hands onto Immich.

      • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Local only ai is fun, but I’m using photoprism (and failing at moving to immich) because my photo library takes hundreds of GB compressed

      • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It syncs your photos so typically your photos will be both backed up to your cloud and on your device. Photos in the app show an icon depending on whether it’s local only (hasn’t been backed up yet) or on both cloud and local, or cloud only (if you deleted the local copy). There will eventually be a feature that allows you to bulk delete all local copies of photos that are backed up (similar to Google photos app’s free up space feature) but for now photos will keep a local copy unless you select the specific photo and delete the local copy.

        Since photos and videos are often local + cloud, that means if you open a photo in the immich gallery which has been cloud synced but still available locally, sharing to another app will use the local copy. Otherwise it will download the photo before sharing to the other app. So it’s pretty seamless in that way.

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    My understanding is that apple/google do that server side because its difficult to do on the phone.

    FOSS wise there are a few tools out there but they are self hosted (ex. Immich). Don’t know if any app-only version exists yet

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Apparently Tidy does it. It’s…a bit resource heavy, and if the picture library is big, it seems to be taking quite a while to chew through it…We’ll see if performance improves after the first scan.

  • something_random_tho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    ente is an e2ee photo storage that has on-device ML. The AI is “ok.” It can generally find what I’m looking for with some false positives thrown in. Not as good as Google’s super computers, but it runs on device and is fully open-source, so I’m happy to use it.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wish these solutions would save their tags to the images themselves. Every gallery with automated or manual tagging seems to have its own way of storing the tags, making them relevant only for that app.

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wow…This really does the job! It really went through my 2 years picture collection, which took about 40min (and a chunk of battery), but after that, any random search term was really nailed on the results shown! Seriously impressive. My concern is, when I opened it a second time, it still took a full couple of minutes to go through the whole picture set again, even though there were no changes to the library…Is there any problem, or the scan is always slow even when there’s no changes?

      Thanks a lot, this is awesome!

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks a lot, it really seems to be working! I’m seriously impressed with the results! Is it…always slow on load, even when there’s no changes to the pictures folder?