cross-posted from: https://linux.community/post/767456

I read posts about people quitting jobs because they’re boring or there is not much to do and I don’t get it: what’s wrong with being paid for doing nothing or not much at all?

Examples I can think of: being paid to be present but only working 30 minutes to 2 hours every 8 hours, or a job where you have to work 5 minutes every 30 minutes.

What’s wrong with reading a book, writing poetry or a novel, exercising, playing with the smartphone… and going home to enjoy your hobbies fully rested?

Am I missing something?

  • ShunkW@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    I had a job like this for about 2 years. There’s only so much content you can consume before you really just start to lose your mind. Also losing skills is a real thing. And to be perfectly honest, when compensated fairly, some of us enjoy our careers.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d rather be at home where i can enjoy my life as i choose if I’m not working. End of it for me. I get it, paid to do nothing but i just don’t like doing nothing. Not saying i want to beat my body or mind up non stop but full stop, hurry up and wait… No thanks.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s more in person hurry up and do nothing jobs than work from home positions, and I would imagine most people complaining are not working from home, or have to maintain availability showing in a chat program, or are just busy enough to not be able to get into what they want to be doing.