• Shadywack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m actually deeply familiar with the architecture, and how caches, memory, and UM’s work. I understand all of that. None of that changes the storage available. Having high memory bandwidth to load/unload memory addresses doesn’t fix the issue of the environment easily exceeding 8GB. I also understand the caching principles and how you actually want RAM utilization to be higher for faster responsiveness. 8GB is still 8GB, and a joke.

      • Shadywack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        8 months ago

        A weeklong battery life, efficient cores, rapid response time, and great software environment make it a great choice…at 16GB for my needs. I will not recommend 8GB to any user at all going forward. It’s marketing malarkey with no future proofing, degrading the viable longevity of the machine.

        There’s no conversation to continue. Glass is glass, and 8GB is 8GB, as well as being a joke.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          If it’s great for your needs, the base model isn’t for you. You can stream video with have 30 tabs open in Safari and only use 4.6GB of UM on an M1 Mac. I just verified for you.