• Melt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Which country will they sell weapons and send airstrike to if they are the only country in the world?

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Texas and Florida are the natural third world countries to invade. Especially texas. The US would move quickly to secure the energy resources and ‘free’ the citizens of a corrupt failed state.

      • scoobford@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        See, I know what you’re trying to say, but that would unironically be an improvement for most of us…

  • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Did you just point a camera down a toilet after taking a massive capitalist shite? 😂

    • deranger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      A United States. You wouldn’t say “an uniform”. You would say “an underling”. First one has a y sound to start, second has a u sound to start. The usage of a/an depends on the next sound, not the next letter.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      It wouldn’t look the same, but the US could domestically produce enough food and energy to sustain itself.

      • Chocrates@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        That could probably be said about anywhere, given time, money, and willingness to reduce population.

        I could probably build an underground vertical farm in the Sahara and feed myself, if I pumped in saltwater to desalinate.

        • TheControlled@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t think that’s true. Many, many countries don’t have what it takes to self sustain in a modern world.

      • TheControlled@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I mean, it absolutely could. California alone supplies the planet with a massive percentage of food. If the this image was accurate, we’d have a surplus of food. We might just have to tolerate losing a lot of stuff we can’t (?) grow, like bananas. Or they’d be remarkably expensive because only Hawaii or Florida or somewhere that could grow them.

        Power? Again, we have collosal amounts of energy or energy potential. From green energy to fossil fuels and natural gas. Without selling it to our allies, we’d have a surplus of energy.

        This is literally why America is the superpower. But a lot of countries could likely do this. Russia could for sure too.

        Economically, however, I can’t even speculate.

        Fun thought experiment, worthy of a Kutzgesagt video!

        Edit: I thought you said “couldn’t” but I already posted so 乁⁠༼⁠☯⁠‿⁠☯⁠✿⁠༽⁠ㄏ