• Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Internet coverage of that topic is surprisingly limited for what seems to be an easily-thought-of national security risk…

    ByteDance’s capitalist entrepreneurs run the enterprise for them, and they can extort data out, yes, for free.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Again, China does not run the company, they just own the leash on the private entrepreneurs who do. That’s one of Deng’s benefits for implementing capitalism. (mildlyinteresting: the word capitalism isn’t capitalized)

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It’s a one-time fee that also earns money back compared to the continuous payments to buy from other sources.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Assuming China doesn’t have to spend literally any other money, even though countries are constantly investing in infrastructure and security and material to assist the business.

              But also, literally not free. My point stands.

              • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                You won’t just stop the maintenance if TikTok didn’t exist. It’s not like all China cares about is data.

                Your question was “why would China get data from TikTok when they can just buy it from Meta”. If China didn’t get the data from ByteDance, ByteDance still incurs the maintenance fee. So no, that is not the expense of getting the data.