• Hubi@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not really, the first one was better in pretty much every single regard.

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      I haven’t really been following because the first was just beyond me…how did they fuck up part 2?

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        7 months ago

        They released the game early access, so everyone was expecting a perfect game from the start because of how much development went into 1. Honestly, while 2 had issues, the game engine is much better than 1, they just needed to bake it more, like several years more, before releasing it hot off the heels of 1.

        • sobanto@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 months ago

          The problem was not only the state they released it. It was the price they wanted for it. 50€ for a game in alpha ?

    • hobovision@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Man that’s been the case with these sequels to games I really loved. Happened to Cities Skylines as well, and at first it seemed like that’s happened with Helldivers but it turns out it was so good it just ruined the servers.