Instead of sending in the troops to deal with what promises to be another dangerous wildfire season, Public Safety Canada is testing the capabilities of civilian-led first responders and relief providers.

Emergency Preparedness Minister Harjit Sajjan said the new program will be deployed during this wildfire season in British Columbia and the Northwest Territories.

Sajjan, a former defence minister, added that the Canadian Armed Forces is “not the best resource to deal with a lot of emergencies,” including wildfires.

The federal government is expanding its existing Humanitarian Workforce Program — which supports non-governmental organizations responding to natural disasters and other large-scale emergencies — to support its 2024 wildfire response and other emergency services through pilot programs in British Columbia and the Northwest Territories.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So we’re privatizing wildfire emergency support services now?

    Jfc. Why can’t the gov’t spend a few bucks and train the people needed to do this, instead of giving billions (because it will be billions) of dollars to private companies who’ll do a shitty job of it anyway?

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Remove fossil fuel subsidies and use that money to pay for training/employment of firefighters and forestry management. We should be fining fossil fuel companies and big polluters but just removing the subsidies is a start and will free up funds to solve problems they helped create.

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have a pet theory, with zero direct evidence, but a bunch of anecdotal hints … that the US has ‘encouraged’ Canada to increase our O&G support and output because they want to cut down on their reliance on SAE/OPEC sources.

        Because so far America is doing the bare minimum to wean itself off O&G, so they need a reliable alternative source … and we’re it.

        If that is true it explains why we purchased the TCP, and completed the line, plus the billions we spend subsidizing O&G.

    • brenticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just to be clear, a majority of wildfire response efforts are provincial and CAF basically gets called in when resources are tapped out across the country. And Quebec actually did privatize their wildfire emergency response a while back, although I don’t know the details on how that compares against their public agency. And lots of bits and pieces of response are either privatized or partially privatized in many provinces, such as aircraft and helicopter resourcing.

      All that said: yeah, CAF just needs to be trained better for emergency response functions. It’s most of what we use our armed forces for anyways. I’ve heard plenty of stories of CAF being deployed and then sitting around for a week because their radios aren’t compatible and they don’t know how to integrate into a unified command structure. These are the things that need to be sorted out, not throwing more money at more entities who can complicate things.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Instead of sending in the troops to deal with what promises to be another dangerous wildfire season, Public Safety Canada is testing the capabilities of civilian-led first responders and relief providers.

    Sajjan, a former defence minister, added that the Canadian Armed Forces is “not the best resource to deal with a lot of emergencies,” including wildfires.

    The pilot program will involve multiple non-governmental organizations: the Canadian Red Cross, St. John Ambulance, the Salvation Army, the veteran-led Team Rubicon and the Search and Rescue Volunteer Association of Canada (SARVAC).

    While British Columbia and Alberta experienced favourable spring conditions that led to fewer wildfires and evacuations, federal officials warned the situation could change rapidly.

    The military’s top operations commander, Vice-Admiral Bob Auchterlonie, has warned that the Armed Forces is being used too often in response to weather and wildfire crises.

    In December, he told CBC that he tells provincial emergency measures organizations and federal agencies that the military should not be the first option for responding to natural disasters.


    The original article contains 690 words, the summary contains 163 words. Saved 76%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!