• DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m saying this is a strategy Hamas uses, and they haven’t stopped. They have been launching rockets from Rafah, hospitals and other civilian areas, they told civilians not to evacuate from war zones, and since half of Gaza is children that means yes, Hamas is attacking Israel from among children.

    I’m saying using such despicable tactics is not a free genocide without reprisal card, nor should it confer a tactical advantage as that just means more of this in the future.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes. You have already made it clear that you think the murder of thousands of children is justified for the sake of Israel’s self-defense.

      And I have made it clear that I think that if you have to kill thousands of children in the name of self-defense, you have nothing worth defending.

      Suggesting that there is anything reason to justify killing thousands of children is pretty disturbing.

      I would sacrifice my own life to save one child.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Collateral damage is not murder. I feel like a parrot having to refute all these same inaccurate characterizations over and over again. Calling it murder doesn’t make it so.

        Good thing you’re not in charge of any defense forces. If your opponents strapped their own children to tanks I suppose you’d just let them roll in and take over.

        • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s not a genocide because of collateral damage. It’s a genocide because they used wholly inappropriate 2000 lbs bombs on civilian targets, used starvation as a tactic, refused to let meaningful amounts of humanitarian aid in, bombed schools and hospitals, and used genocidal language that demonstrates intent.

          Go ahead and defend Itamar Ben-Gvir if you want but he’s a Kahanist. Go ahead and defend Netanyahu but he’s the one who is a disgrace to Judaism and arguably the worst leader of a major power in my lifetime. War crimes have happened. Mass graves exist and torture prisons exist. Genocide requires intent and I’d argue there’s been dozens of statements by members of Israel’s cabinet that constitute a very strong case.

            • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              At the very least, we can agree that this is not a normal war and both Hamas and Israeli actions require an investigation. Hamas, being a terrorist group and not a state actor, should be treated as a terrorist group. They don’t represent Palestine at the UN and no one in their right mind recognizes them as anything other than a stain upon the world.

              Israel (and Fatah) have a different level of responsibility. I understand that October 7th was despicable. I hope Hamas disappears. But Israel, if it wants to be in the community of nations, has to conduct war in accordance with the laws of war. And I don’t think they have.

              I would obviously say the same about the Rohingya genocide and the unfolding one in Darfur. Never again means never again. I’ve been to the genocide museum in DC and concentration camps in Europe but also the Rwandan genocide memorial and others. I think what we’re seeing is a genocide. Nothing is clear in the fog of war so it won’t be clear today or tomorrow but the UN is not wrong for investigating.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Israel crossed the line from self defense into genocide when they started ruthlessly executing innocent civilians and aid workers. You cannot justify their bullshit.

              Propaganda/Genocide denial/justification removed.

                • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Do you want to discuss the over 500 incitements of genocide? When it comes to intent, Israel’s intent has been documented more than most

                  Since the commencement of our investigative efforts on October 7th, 2023, Law for Palestine has meticulously amassed a compelling body of evidence exposing the proliferation of incitement to violence and genocidal intent perpetrated by Israeli officials and public figures, against Palestinians. Our documentation encompasses over 500 incitements of violence and genocidal incitement, appearing in the forms of social media posts, television interviews, and official statements from Israeli politicians, army personnel, journalists, and other influential personalities.

                  https://law4palestine.org/law-for-palestine-releases-database-with-500-instances-of-israeli-incitement-to-genocide-continuously-updated/

                  • Iceblade@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Hi and apologies for the late reply - /c/world@lemmy.world moderator @jordanlund@lemmy.world removed my comment and gave me a temporary ban for the comment you replied to citing that it was “Pro-Israel propaganda”.

                    First off, thank you for posting this link - and no, I’m not interested in discussing them. My point was that users should be held to a higher standard when posting as moderators than the rest of us.

                    I will however give a comment on the contents of the cited webpage. I read through the statements from decision makers (These seemed most relevant), and they did (in my personal view) not amount to intent. However, as law4palestine highlights:

                    The ultimate adjudication of this matter is contingent upon the determination of a competent court.

                    Personally, I want to see a full investigation by the ICJ conducted, and if they do end up with an indictment, those responsible brought to justice.

                • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You simply are not paying attention or sea lioning if you’re demanding sources.

                  But for anyone else who may have missed it:

                  Israel illegally attacked and killed aid workers in Southern Lebanon:

                  https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/05/07/israel-us-arms-used-strike-killed-lebanon-aid-workers

                  Then followed it up by illegally and attacking World Central Kitchen workers in Gaza.

                  https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/04/middleeast/jose-andres-wck-israel-strike-criticism-intl/index.html

                  Your pro-Israel propaganda WILL NOT be tolerated here.

                  • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I’m informed and simply disagree with you. Is that not allowed? Is disagreement always “propaganda?” Do you prefer an echo chamber?

                    Israel is not infallible. This is a war, sometimes they get bad Intel, sometimes collateral damage happens, sometimes there’s fog of war…

                    In both of those attacks Israel was targeting militants and appears to have hit civilians.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          If your opponents strapped their own children to tanks I suppose you’d just let them roll in and take over.

          You know, I was going to answer the rest substantively, but this is the most ludicrous thing I’ve heard in quite some time. You are not here in good faith.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I used a somewhat satirical metaphor you don’t like, so now I’m not here in good faith? Interesting reasoning.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              “Somewhat satirical” does not describe the ludicrous thing you said. So yes, you’re not here in good faith.