Airbnb's success story stands out in stark contrast to the struggles of other startups. Unlike Zillow's disastrous attempt at house-flipping, Airbnb has flourished for over a decade. Their revenue skyrocketed, tripling from $3.3 billion to nearly $10 billion. Even more impressive, they flipped profitability, going from annual losses of $4-5 billion to earning the same staggering amount. Perhaps the strongest indicator of their dominance is their resilient stock price. Unlike the post-IPO crashes
  • gian @lemmy.grys.itEnglish
    1·
    6 months ago

    Because often it is a nightmare to evict a tenant that do not pay the rent.

    I can speak for where I live where a lot of people gone to the short-rental way exactly because that way they have the certainty that when they want the house back, for every reason, they have it.

    To me AirBnB is not the problem, it is the wrong solution to a real problem.

    • buzz86us@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      6 months ago

      Whole home or dedicated AIRBNB should be banned… If I had a room going unused I’d AirBnb

      • gian @lemmy.grys.itEnglish
        1·
        6 months ago

        I agree with you to some extend.

        What I do not agree about is the implicit assumption that if AIRBNB is banned then every house that was used for short-term rental would become available on the long-term rental market.

        The main advantage of the short-term rental (obvious higher profits aside) is the fact that the owner is sure to be able to get back the house if/when he need it. So many owners saw the possibility to use an house with AirBnB (or other similar ways) a lot more attractive than keeping it empty (paying the taxes on it) and much less risky than having a long-term rental where the tenants could be turn out to be a bad one.