• bamboo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because they’re both extremely misogynistic and also trying to argue against human anatomy.

    • Deebster@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Do you also attack dictionaries for explaining offensive words? The person I’m talking to never used the term, they merely explained the meaning behind the number.

      What you are doing is shooting the messenger. Please target your outrage more carefully in future.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        They’re also the one straight up using the term, which is why I asked in the first place (that being I had no clue what it meant)

      • JamesFire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Do you also attack dictionaries for explaining offensive words?

        If they use them in an obviously offensive way, yes.

        The person who gave the explanation is the same person who initially used it to mean offense. You can check the usernames to see exactly this.

        They’re an ass. There is no messenger.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s a derogatory term used to dehumanize people. I call a prostitute a sex worker out of respect, but it’s entirely irrelevant to this conversation unless you’re just gonna go off on a completely different level of misogyny.