• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s legit.

    I feel like we’re generally pretty late for climate policy protests, but hopefully better late than never!

        • Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Slowing things down would be putting the sulphur back in diesel and spraying it from jets in the upper atmosphere. Any reduction in pollution at this point will just accelerate warming as we lose the cooling effect from the particulates in the atmosphere.

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            What a bunch of nonsense.

            Every GHG emission not done will slow down global warming. Pollution is detrimental to vegetation and thus detrimental to the only source of reliable carbon sinks we have.

            • Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Oh no it’s absolutely worse in the long term. We have the choice of being super-fucked or ultra-fucked. If we blast sulphur into the atmosphere we might get to enjoy one generation of having food and water (maybe).