Thanks again for your time and consideration.

We are discussing here in a community dedicated to science and clearly I have to acknowledge that your arguments here are much better than mine 😆 and that you are very knowledgeable in the current paradigm of science.

Unfortunately for me, there is no community at Lemmy dedicated to the history of science where “very knowledgeable on the current paradigm” would be so telling for historians knowledgeable in this field.

Thanks for your input.

May I take another route and ask you what you know about the history of science … about paradigm shifts … and about how people very knowledgeable on the current paradigm cannot see (most of times historicaly) that a paradigm shift is about to happen ?

i cannot understand everything (far from it) but here is the part where I believe is an alternative explanation for the CMB :

Equations (2.38), (2.39), (2.40), and (2.53) all illustrate that the creation rate of particles with energies larger than the inverse expansion time, ρ, is exponentially suppressed. Parker [11] has noted that these exponential factor are similar to those which appear in thermal spectrum at finite temperature.

i only have access to the preprint :
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.02444.pdf

… what people and organizations believe …
from 2 books (2014 & 2018) and publications made by international or governmental groups from 2017 to 2021.

1. 85% of organizations believe AI will cause job displacement:

2. 62% of people believe AI will eventually become more intelligent than humans:

3. 40% of people believe AI will cause a future war between humans and machines:

4. 39% of people believe AI will lead to a new form of slavery:

5. 37% of people believe AI will become sentient and conscious:

This article never say by which mechanism all the riches produce by the new robot technology replacing humans might be distributed to humans,
(although it hints that’s what may happen) and so the main interpretation of this article would be the probable disparation of humanity.

“US blasts …” we all know clickbait is the foundation of some publications but in the context of possible war, real words should be used instead of meaningless verbiage.

Because they are great in pies that you can have for dessert with some ice cream or a glass of milk.

One of many possibilities :
Scabies, also sometimes known as the seven-year itch, is a contagious human skin infestation by the tiny (0.2–0.45 mm) mite Sarcoptes scabiei, variety hominis. (…)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scabies

Edit :
oops : you were saying it is like a human since it does errors ? maybe i “wooshed”.

Hi @werefreeatlast,
i had successes asking LLaMA 3 70B with simple specific questions …
Context : i am bad at programming and it help me at least to see how i could use a few function calls in C from Python … or simply drop Python and do it directly in C.
Like you said, i have to re-write & test … but i have a possible path forward. Clearly you know what you do on a computer but i’m not really there yet.

i agree with every main comments posted here until now which are opposed to this policy of yours, at least about this part :

(…) we do believe that when you excessively post/comment/reply negative things in News about one person (… ((you are eligible to ban)) …)

i join my voice to other users here to say this policy should focus more on frequency of posts and quality of sources. (more emphasis should be put on explaining to us what here excessively means)

There should be no restriction of stating, in comments, the fact that one candidate is, for example, a convicted felon + rapist etc … if this is established as factual.

Someone closer to the developers than you are ?

infos & some criticism of the app :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life360
(also some cars have integrated tracking)

Both aid and duel … so : dual purposes

My first guess on the title was : “this should be caused by a positive feedback with forest fires in the loop”.
…so, I went and read this Wikipedia article :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_feedbacks
… and it says :

(…) Carbon cycle uncertainty is driven by the large rates at which CO₂ is both absorbed into plants and released when biomass burns or decays. For instance, permafrost thaw produces both CO₂ and methane emissions, in ways that are difficult to model. (…)

But it also says that this one is not the most important feedback loop.

This one is a much better explanation and unfortunately i tend to agree with you here that humanity will not solve this in time.
… unless, maybe, we apply drastic geo - engineering methods that would solve only part of the problem.
And so, i expect a sharp decrease in humanity’s population over the next few decades.

if you equate USA with Europe …
then France will be one of the states …
and Macron would be the governor of his state who would decides to call state election because on the federal level his party lost (while there was not yet elections at the state level)

Also : this election called by Macron calls for a possible change of his government but his own seat as president is not challenge until the next election in 2027.

So, this concept is too expensive :

(…) In February 2023, the company announced it would cease developing the vehicle, citing a failure to crowdsource sufficient funds.

Wow !

For the current study, the team used hyaluronic acid as the scaffolding, or base, for their new lymph node, and added MHC (major histocompatibility complex) or HLA (human histocompatibility antigen) molecules, which rev up T cells and other immune system components. Then, they also added molecules and antigens common to cancer cells to “teach” T cells what to look for.

(“NES” : Nintendo Entertainment System)
… you will beat me at this job interview 😆 !