• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 27th, 2023

help-circle


  • Sad, because I was a fan of them and bought all their games from Saint’s Row 1 all the way to Gat out of Hell (although not in chronological order) and got Agents of Mayhem for free somewhere, but think they’ve made some bad moves lately.

    I think it all started going downhill from Agents of Mayhem, and them screwing up with the reboot of Saint’s Row was probably the nail in the coffin. I wish they’d just made Saint’s Row 5 instead, with wacky time travel shenanigans and a more polished set of superpowers.

    At the point where they decided to “reboot” to something old school and grittier (TOO old school, imo) they really didn’t get what their fanbase wanted, and what new players who’d only heard of and experienced Saint’s Row 4 would get excited about.

    They could’ve probably taken Saint’s Row up to 6 entries if they’d just iterated on the formula from 4 and possibly Gat out of Hell (I wouldn’t know, I got distracted and didn’t play it after I bought it, ironically). Similar to how United Front Games (the developer of Sleeping Dogs) could’ve probably stayed in business if they’d just made Sleeping Dogs 2 instead of that horrible “free to play” multiplayer asset flip of some of the least interesting elements of Sleeping Dogs 1.


  • Honestly, I mostly don’t agree with the term “Early Access”, if you’re charging money for it, it’s released. If people are paying to play it and it’s in an incomplete, buggy state, then they’re not only beta testing and co-developing a title, they’re PAYING to do so. They’re paying to work, which is even worse than working for free.

    I don’t know many, if any games that are really worth doing this for (with exceptions like Larian Studios and Baldur’s Gate 3 and the Divinity Original Sin series) because most games honestly shouldn’t exist. There are way too many games and way too few people to play them. It’s similar to Movies, TV, and Music. Most of the creative media out there should not exist and have no customer base or interest.

    They’re not made so people can enjoy them, they’re made because of the creators’ desire to make them. It leads to the atrocious workplace conditions and exploitative labor the entertainment industry at large has, and why it’s so difficult to unionize or get fair wages, hours, or treatment. Even with the actually good games, there’s way too many for people to actually finish in their lifetime. Now add the mediocre and bad games, and it’s exponentially more impossible.


  • We basically are. The only good news is that young conservatives believe in and want to do something about climate change, so when the current crop of oil-funded deniers die off, we have some hope to limit the damage. That said, I’m seriously considering moving up north away north as far away from the equator as possible, and to an area with fresh water and farmland.

    Then buying a gun. Never thought I’d need one after I left the Army, but as things get worse, I suspect that more violence will result due to scarcity and more likely: stress related to perceived scarcity that doesn’t exist. It’s always the fear that’s more dangerous than the reality. We can probably get by with easy to grow, nutrient-dense foods that are boring to eat, like beans. It’s the stress of not being able to eat “tasty” food that’ll probably get people to snap. Gunfights over steak, etc.


  • Don’t they have a legal obligation to release this game due to financing they took which would force them to pay a huge penalty if they didn’t release it?

    Don’t get me wrong, I think they could still salvage this into an okay game, I just don’t have my hopes up that it’ll be a good one.

    Last Ubisoft game I bought was Far Cry 6, which was better than I thought it’d be, but it was still not great, and I dropped it after I finished the campaign. I feel like Ubisoft doesn’t know how to make original feeling games anymore. They stopped experimenting, and it shows.



  • I doubt the title of this article very much. Ukraine is getting F-16’s and probably JAS-39 Gripens very soon. Offensives and counteroffensives have to be slow and methodical by nature against entrenched forces, otherwise you’ll take massive losses for very little gains.

    Ukraine is on its way to gaining air superiority, and more vehicles and air defense is coming into their forces every month, and the longer this conflict lasts, the more likely it is that they’ll gain more advantages over Russia as the sanctions keep draining them.

    The lack of air superiority is hampering what Ukraine can do, and once that issue’s settled, I think we’ll start seeing more steady progress. Plus in the wide world, Japans and South Korea are settling their differences over WW2 and will probably keep cooperating, and part of that will be to send more stuff to Ukraine in order to help win there so they don’t have to fight WW3 with China over Taiwan.

    It’s not just the West that supports Ukraine, it’s also the Democratic parts of Asia.


  • Same. I stay away from #Explore and just keep to my feed of people I actually follow. And I make sure to unfollow those who are too stressful to hear from constantly.

    I agree with almost all the of all politics all the time people who constantly post negative things, but it’s too tiring to read them, especially since knowing about it does me no good and I can’t do anything about it anyway. I already vote and donate as much as I can, and I live in a Blue state so anything outside of my area’s just not possible for me to influence.

    I’ve found it’s better just to ignore it and focus on positive things that make my life better.


  • This is also why I stopped going to Mastodon. In addition to negative ragebait politics being almost the only thing that’s trending (and I have too much of that in my life already) there’s no real nuance or tolerance for anything outside the echo chamber.

    You DO get called a racist nazi transphobe for stepping outside the box or trying to support people, ideas or places that might not be 100% perfect or pass the strictest ideological purity test. I thought Liberal Twitter was pretty exclusionary and echo-chamber-y, but Mastodon’s a lot worse.




  • Agree. Even recently, I would have up to 5-6 cans worth myself (have since cut down a lot), but alongside the financial cost, there’s also the acid eating away at your stomach lining and the excess caffeine to worry about alongside the Aspartame.

    Frankly, given the stomach issues and acid reflux that too much soda can give you, I would imagine that people (even sodaholics) would have to stop much sooner than 20 due to all the other issues involved with sodas before the problems with Aspartame would even come into the picture.

    Not to say that I’m not leery of Aspartame, but diet Soda has other major issues beside it.


  • Given how modern AAA games are and Bethesda’s recent track history, it’s not negative to be skeptical, it’s smart.

    Especially since despite Microsoft watching over them and helping them to have the most “bug free launch in history” it’s still probably going to be a hot mess for weeks to a month after launch. I want to be pleasantly surprised, but I’m not getting my hopes up.

    Plus, the recent release of Baldur’s Gate 3 with no microtransactions or season passes, etc. has gotten peoples’ standards up, and given that Microsoft paid a lot of money to buy Bethesda, we’re aware that they’re going to have to make that money back somehow, and will probably give into the temptation to do some really player unfriendly things to do it.

    Bethesda’s been going all in on surprisingly expensive microtransactions for really tiny amounts of content, like in Fallout 4 and 76, and it wouldn’t be shocking for them to continue in that direction. People aren’t being mindlessly negative, they’re looking at current and past trends and making an educated guess about the future.


  • I’ll probably transition my AMD 8350 build over to Linux when Win10 stops being supported. As opposed to my mom’s FX-8370 build, which I’ll probably just have to replace with a new Windows 11 system, as there’s no way I’m expecting her (an elderly woman) to learn anything other than Windows. Especially since she’s reliant on Windows-only apps.

    The actual hardware she’s using will probably be converted to a Linux Desktop, but I’ll have to migrate her data to a new mini Windows 11 PC or something.



  • Hope it’s better than the first one. It was too repetitive for me and the pacing was too slow. It spent too much time in Greece, and took way to long to get to Babylon and China Had some serious balance issues as well, to the point where I actually wondered why they allowed certain “class” combinations at all.

    I hope this new game doesn’t force you to distribute stat points 1 at a time (almost no one wants to do that) and also allows for cheap or free respecs at any time. It gets boring using the same abilities all the time, no matter how optimal they are. Swapping builds and powers on the fly helps you feel like you’re playing a brand new game.

    It’s a lesson that Blizzard learned with Diablo 3 and 4 and even World of Warcraft, which is why those games don’t force you to look up a guide before spending every single stat point, and also allow you to respec easily to try something new and keep you engaged.


  • Depends on how well written the evil route is. I think most people don’t like evil routes where you’re just a mustache twirling murderer, slaver, torturer, etc.

    But if it’s written more like Breaking Bad where you’re doing desperate things for desperate reasons, and /or because of relatable character flaws, then they’re more into it. It’s rare that games actually have a story as deep and well written as Breaking Bad or Better Call Saul, where if you stop and think about it, the Protagonists are obviously the villains of the story, but nuanced portrayals of villainy are what work better, imo.

    Someone mentioned Tyranny in this thread (which is basically Pillars of Eternity 1.5 in terms of gameplay) and while it’s not as compelling or as well written as Breaking Bad, it does have a story where you’re the “bad guy” but you don’t really have a choice in the matter. You’re doing bad things to prevent worse things from happening, and you have to do them or else worse things will happen to you.

    What I like better than the “evil” route are where people do “good” things but it leads to a bad result, like in Fallout 3, where spoiler alert:

    -------------Spoilers------------
    You can negotiate to let Ghouls into Tenpenny Tower, only for the Ghouls to turn around and kill all the humans in there, because it turns out the Ghouls were racist against humans, and were total hypocrites.
    -----------End Spoilers---------

    Similar to a news story in real life I read recently, where a Taco Bell manager with a heart of gold hired the homeless guy sleeping behind the store, and allowed him to sleep in his house, only for the guy to constantly blow up and threaten his co-workers and then “repay” that act of kindness by shooting that manager dead. No good deed goes unpunished, as they say. It’s why I’m careful with my charity nowadays and prefer to let organized groups do it rather than reaching out directly. This is not the only story like this I’ve heard or read about.


  • Au contraire, I think more rich people should take risks like this. It shows how macho and ahead of the curve and disruptive they are. All those other rich people that aren’t willing to get into an experimental vehicle with risk of catastrophic failure and even death are just crybaby namby pamby cucks who aren’t living their best lives!

    Just buy ride it! If you were on your deathbead, and you looked back, wouldn’t you regret not having tried it while you still could’ve?

    /S