A “trickle down” setting

As a software dev, any code library named SimpleWhatever or whose documentation contains the word “simply” anywhere makes me afraid.

Because they never are. They are a sign that whoever makes them thinks the subject is too hard to understand.

The end result is a code library that doesn’t make the inherent important hard parts organized and clear to work with, but obfuscates them.

Quack

A good example of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance

This site mostly has articles that creatively rearrange parts of facts and sprinke sciency terminology to make incredible claims.

A retired physicist having a thought experiment on prehistoric remains years ago in a different context, plus some rando claiming these are man-made structures, becomes: “another hypothesis is that it was constructed by prehistoric human civilization (like described in the Silurian Hypothesis by NASA scientists)”

Software developer here. I only apply for onsite jobs if I believe I will be able to formally or informally switch to hybrid once I build some trust.

Spam.

AI generated site that re-hosts an existing game.

Example of clearly AI drivel, the instruction for the player to “explain your answer”

HOOOONK HOOOONK HOOOONK! …if you know what I mean. ;)

You may or may not be making a valid point, but you need to be clearer about who you are referring to and in which context.

Vague and does not cite sources meaningfully. The words that appear to link to sources, just link to other articles on the site.

Eagerly waiting for Tactical Breach Wizards to release…

Because the political leanings of a combat unit has zero bearing on anything. They are not in charge. They are not being allied with. They have aligned interests in fighting a greater evil.

So any attempts to pretend it matters does clearly, nakedly, come from a place of wanting to push back against supporting Ukraine’s defense.

Spot on.

Rough summary of when it is energy and effort efficient: https://xkcd.com/1924/

Bringing the ships into waters completely monitored by countries friendly to Ukraine, and surrounded by a number of launching points for sabotage actions by basically anyone.

It would be a risky move if anybody cared about their navy, or felt it was a threat.

You misinterpreted it.

If you check a DragEvent’s currentTarget it will always point to some appendage of a “dom”.

This.

Any action other than assisting the invaders would be an improvement.

Yes, the oppressed are eager to hurt people any way they can, and nobody can expect it to be any other way.

But still, launching long range missiles isn’t an impulse action. There are so many actors domestic and internationally to do production, procurement, installation, logistics, assembly, that we can assume someone high up has made a strategic decision based on expected outcome.

And the expected outcome is extremely obvious: a) zero tactical gains, and b) more excuses to ignore international pressure and hit Rafah even more brutally.

A doctor commented on how alarming it was that he suffered liver damage from the project - it was on a level they only saw in people drining heavily.