My suggestion is move it up. I don’t know where on your list it is but higher is probably better.
It’s a fantastic game. There’s still bugs, sometimes even major ones. Still easily worth your time though.
My suggestion is move it up. I don’t know where on your list it is but higher is probably better.
It’s a fantastic game. There’s still bugs, sometimes even major ones. Still easily worth your time though.
Or even just a board game night.
Maybe it just means boring guys. Drinking is a secondary activity, not a primary one.
The given answers, and so they can act like there wasn’t that much of what happened.
No one can watch all that, so they’ll claim that violence is cherry picked and it’s the mostly peaceful protest they’ve been claiming the whole time.
It’s still a lie but it’s one they’re giving “evidence” to their supporters for.
Well they were unspecific about who it was good for
A worthwhile thing to keep in mind whether it’s for tea, supplements, or whatever, is that medication is based on things that were observed from “natural” sources.
For example, willow bark was/is/has been used for pain and inflammation. It also contains salicin which is similar to acetysalicylic acid, which you’ll know better as aspirin.
Does that mean all the things people say do a thing work? Not at all. Do some of them have varying degrees of effect of some percentage of people? Yes.
100% There was a whole lot of it being pushed in response to the USSR’s existence. IIRC that’s when “under God” got added to the pledge, for example
In fairness, Gmail had a similar invite system when it launched and that’s been way more successful than G+
Nah. I’ve had a domain registered with them for years and I just got the email too
prosthetics and bionics are taking leaps and bounds
Heh
That white woman has families all over the country
I think you’re wrong on the overwhelming majority and that they’ll still be fine with it should it happen.
Good luck I guess
And if a home invader with commercially available arms so decided it’s the end of your family. That’s how scale works.
But you don’t give in to a bully to avoid violence. That’s how you get more people/countries bullied.
This is not intended as a threat of violence. This is an analogy to make a point that should be obvious
My quote, not theirs. Also Russia is a bully. Similar to the kind that takes lunch money, but on a much larger scale
Except it’s less likely to be donation based and more likely to be fee based.
The fact that you’re aware of any kind of ad blocking for Netscape reinforces my position that blocking was a leader in the arms race
Not more powerful, just more willing to do whatever to get what they want.
If good people always lose then why do we still have good people? Why do good acts still occur?
You’ve got an important word there. Scale.
Countries aren’t people but they’re made up of them. It wouldn’t take nuclear weapons to annihilate your household.
Russia has invaded Ukraine’s home and tried to lay claim. Now you’re suggesting they give up what was taken from them to satisfy your desire for peace.
The analogy the other person used is fair. In another analogy Russia is nothing more than a bully. We’ve long moved past the time where the advice we give is to just give the bully your money so they don’t beat you up and take it anyway.
And nothing of value was lost I guess
There were no adblocking extensions for early internet explorer so consider its share 0.
What you consider it to be is irrelevant. An extension wasn’t any more the only way to block ads then than it is now. Ad blocking has absolutely been happening longer than there have been extensions to do it.
Adblocking increased at twice the rate of new internet users
Which means it’s going to reach a critical mass at some point, no? What would you expect to happen then?
very obviously trolling or roleplaying
Damn am I sick of people falling on this regardless of what the disagreement is over or who it is with. Even if it were true, which it’s not, you have a better picture of the situation, at least if you’re willing to accept that someone legitimately disagrees with you.
I’m sorry to hear about your food
There’s something perversely amusing, given the conversation, how you seem to expect me to answer your question without seemingly being willing to answer mine.
I’ll answer, but not until you’ve extended the courtesy of doing so yourself with the questions you’ve already been asked.
Didn’t I read this headline a few years ago?