even if this specific example were, the law of large numbers means there’s a very high likelihood that at least one person really holds this attitude.
You already know who i am.
even if this specific example were, the law of large numbers means there’s a very high likelihood that at least one person really holds this attitude.
it took me a long time to realise that just because it has the word liberty (almost) in it, doesn’t mean it’s a left-wing idea.
I think you said the unspoken part out loud.
a stainless steel, vacuum sealed French press (coffee plunger), which I bought back in… 2011? i think? when I broke my glass one a week after getting it.
they only did that for the painting.
pay some prostitutes to come to your thanksgiving dinner and debate your uncle on his ideas about immigrants.
unfortunately, I entirely lack imagination. happily, however, this is not a case where one is needed.
you got the last letter of the C-word right, but it’s one letter too short.
some republicans are good people not awful to literally everyone
some republicans are good people in the same way some cops are good cops.
… ARAC
this puts me in mind of the conservative neighbours I had living out in the country a couple of years ago. need to borrow milk, get your car started, towed out of mud, whatever, they were there to help.
but they quit America to come here because it was becoming a socialist hellhole.
(‘here’ is not less socialist than America)
so what’s the plunger/French press?
the hosting is free, you just pay a subscription to ensure it stays that way.
I definitely have BO, but I can’t smell my own, typically. however, I also just don’t find the smell of sweat/BO particularly offensive.
I’ve started using not an antiperspirant, but a substance that acts like a deodorant, because my partner is VERY sensitive to smells and mine apparently sets her off pretty badly.
and the open source, free tools for creating such games are getting better almost by the day.
Obama was all into war crimes in the middle east too, so I can’t pretend I’m surprised.
but expecting people - not just many people, but a lot, an enormous number, at least a majority if not an overwhelming majorly - to spontaneous commit to a coordinated action despite widely differing philosophies, politics and life circumstances, is like expecting dissolved sugar to spontaneously re-crystallise back into a cube at the bottom of your cup.
plausible paths to change require organisation, and there are not very many examples of successful organisation that aren’t led from the top.
better yet, just don’t autoplay fucking videos! if I want to watch it, I’ll click on it!
Jung’s work is too derivative. If you want to be taken seriously, coach it in terms of Freud’s theories.