People on low salaries are exactly the sort of people who would be vulnerable to being bribed by foreign adversaries.

Yeah you’re right, immediately thought I’d low balled it.

Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) sought a lead cyber security expert and advertised annual pay of £41,935

That’s fucking shocking. And after they can’t fill that role they’ll bring in a contractor and pay 4 times as much.

Lindelof: “oh I don’t think so”.

If she gets a retrial/appeal they will have to go through all the evidence with a fresh start, unless the prosecution withdraw their case (as what happened to Lucia De Berk).

Stop thinking of them as people, they are just meat space for brands. Like a billboard or those little posters above urinals.

I’m not sure it’s a law per se but more guidance that schools should endeavour to serve children a balanced diet which will include portions of meat/fish/poultry/dairy.

Says party donor who happens to own vegan catering business that supplies schools.

This article doesn’t explain exactly why the statistical anomaly should be inadmissable in court.

Were they asking for it to be inadmissible? My take was the RSS are implying the court allowed the jury to be misled as to its significance by not having a statistician on hand to explain it. It’s almost an exact replay of what happened in the Lucia De Berk case, later overturned and since described as “the greatest miscarriage of justice” in the Netherlands. Worth a read if you’re interested.

It’s uncanny how much of it exactly mirrors what happened to Lucia De Berk.

It’s a bit mad that we aren’t allowed to know who owns it.

These exist and are good

Any examples off the top of your head? I would assume/speculate they are fairly expensive?

20 years ago there were complaints that GP’s were using Google, now its normal. Can’t help but feel the same will happen here.

Men harming ex-partners. Unfortunately not uncommon.

deleted by creator

Oh my mistake there then. Rockhoppers are one species that are monogamous for life.

That doesn’t explain why the same couples keep coming back to each other season after season.

10 hours per month? It’s a start at least.

Thanks, I guess it was the part where how this caused “malicious harm” given he didn’t reveal any sort of hidden scandal or illegal acitivty but the other user explained it’ll result in patients being afraid to access medical care which is beginning to make sense to me. I’m not based in the US, this is all so alien to me.

Thank for taking the time to lay that out for me. I am unable to comprehend the motives, but that at least starts to explain it. Unthinkable.

Dude forgot his hippocratic oath.