if you are looking for a HURD based stable OS you are a bit out of luck.
- 1 Post
- 50 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 27th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
12·1 month agoProbably wiping process control code from the systems that contain tons of fiddly hard to find constants and other information.
10·2 months agoThis aircraft predates most of the issues. I suspect FedEx cheaped on maintanance.
1·2 months agoI feel like I saw this hallway on McMansion Hell
I wouldn’t trust the Java app sandbox at all. They basically abandoned it.
I would like to ban the Midwest from using the word salad. their misunderstanding of it will hurt someone sooner or later.
Bringing new meaning to the phrase “assume cows are spherical”
Based on the comments it appears the prompt doesn’t really even fully work. It mainly seems to be something to laugh at while despairing over the writer’s nonexistant command of logic.
53·3 months agoIt’s probably confusing people already who never rented VHS tapes
13·3 months agoI’m a bit concerned what happens when Gabe Newell dies
Honestly it got pretty visible during the height of the covid pandemic: https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-health-68c9762a4420094d300f9cbada0186f8
Not sure how much worse you could make it.
Where do I sign up?
3·4 months agoThe stabbing rate in the UK for example is lower than it is in the US per capita. So the idea knives replace guns doesn’t really seem to hold
5·4 months agoNot a JS dev either but
===.Not really sure what the
(+x)is about
4·4 months agoThe thing is the whole c program is unsafe. In rust individual parts are marked unsafe. This means auditing should be easier. Also being always on your toes isn’t really viable. Breaking down the program into safe vs unsafe is probably an improvment
In cases where bugs have been counted they tended to make up the majority of vulnerabilities. Chrome, Firefox, and Windows reported that around 70% of security vulnerabilites were memory corruption. Yes a subset, but the majority of the worst subset.
The feds are actually disturbingly fair about this. You can deduct your legal fees as a business expense.
wikipedia excerpt
While embezzlers, thieves, and the like are forced to report their illegally acquired income for tax purposes, they may also take deductions for costs relating to criminal activity. For example, in Commissioner v. Tellier, a taxpayer was found guilty of engaging in business activities that violated the Securities Act of 1933.[8] The taxpayer subsequently deducted the legal fees he spent while defending himself.[8] The U.S. Supreme Court held that the taxpayer was allowed to deduct the legal fees from his gross income because they meet the requirements of §162(a),[9] which allows the taxpayer to deduct all the “ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on a trade or business.”[10] The Court reasoned (and the Internal Revenue Service did not contest the point) that it was ordinary and necessary for a person engaged in a business to expect to have legal fees associated with that business, even though such things may only happen once in a lifetime.[9] Therefore, the taxpayer in Tellier was allowed to deduct his legal fees from his gross income, even though he incurred the fees because of his crime. The U.S. Supreme Court in Tellier reiterated that the purpose of the tax code was to tax net income, not punish unlawful behavior.[11] The Court suggested that if this was not the case, Congress would change the tax code to include special tax rules for illegal conduct
The simple solution here is to record to flash when wifi dies. Yes wired stuff is nice but half of these are consumer installed.
Scam Altman Freid strikes again
Fun fact! This chart is just strait up wrong. McDonalds prices are up around 20% compared to wages that are up 28%.