how could anyone with a brain think that was going to work?

depiction yes, but if no person or animal is harmed is it abuse?

Because “CSAM” states abuse as the third word in the acronym. Machine learning could (in theory, I lack knowledge on the current implementations) be trained without any children being abused (in any traditional sense anyway) and used to produce the content without any real children being involved (ignoring training data).

The downvotes likely come from a difference in definition between abuse and CP, images of nonexistent people cannot realistically harm anyone.

Finally, that tired excuse of a sport has no reason to exist