• 56 Posts
  • 143 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 28th, 2023

help-circle










  • Of course cooperate social media isn’t the only harmful social media, if anything it might be the most civil one for its scale, simply because they’re trying to sell ads next to the content so the content can’t be complete garbage. They also have a bunch of other incentives that ultimately make it a shit experience for everyone, but there is an incentive to moderate.

    Something to remember is that it isn’t the company producing the harmful content. It’s people.













  • I think the reason why meta wants to federate is this:

    • it helps with anticompetitive arguments, because it’s “open” and not controlled by meta alone
    • some will refuse to use anything from meta, and threads users being able to communicate with them adds value
    • it won’t hurt meta, because the majority will be using their app anyways
    • it helps their image

    I don’t think they’re doing it to “get more data” or to “take over the fediverse”. There’s nothing worth taking over for them currently and since most people don’t care about the fediverse I don’t see it growing much either. Although I’d certainly like it if that were the case.

    They can probably get the data already, it’s all openly available. Federating it’s basically all upside and no downside for them, but it’s not exactly the biggest priority to implement it, it‘s going to take some time.

    I’m not saying it might not have a negative effect or that they care a lot for what’s currently there. They’ll certainly want to monetize threads sooner or later.



  • Sry, I‘m still not following. I don’t understand your argument, are you saying they want to federate to gain additional users to grab data from? Because I don’t think that’s going to be a significant amount of people.

    Most people don’t care about what makes the fediverse desirable to its current users, all it does is add friction to them and therefore I don’t see it growing much either.

    I think the reason why meta wants to federate is this:

    • it helps with anticompetitive arguments, because it’s “open” and not controlled by meta alone
    • some will refuse to use anything from meta, and threads users being able to communicate with them adds value
    • it won’t hurt meta, because the majority will be using their app anyways
    • it helps their image

    I don’t think they’re doing it to “get more data” or to “take over the fediverse”. There’s nothing worth taking over and they can probably get the data anyways, it’s all openly available. So it’s basically all upside and no downside for them.


  • Maybe I’m not getting something here, but neither Mastodon nor Lemmy are private, you can find everything open for everyone already, so how would federation change something there? Federation doesn’t mean everyone would use their app, so they wouldn’t gain any app usage analytics.

    Also I don’t get how your metaphor make sense. The amount of fediverse users is a rounding error next to threads, instagram, WhatsApp and facebook. So there’s not a “lot a tiny things that can add up”, only a small amount of tiny things which don’t really add up to anything.