MS Dos 5.0 on my first PC was a bit short on features and I had not enough money for Windows 3.1… I heard that American students were using something called Unix and that their was something close available through mail-order CDs. Yggdrasil CDs were cheap too!

A merge from upstream once a day, at the beginning of the day.

I’m working on a DevOps setting, and even though we’re a small team, we have about two to three changes going through the pipeline a day.

If you keep your fork too long without syncing, it just get more complicated to merge, and more importantly if you need help from the upstream change author they’ll have moved on to another subject and the change won’t be as fresh in their mind as if you had merged the day after they pushed it.

I’ve had that kind of reaction - on rebases also - and most times it was in fact a code smell pointing to a case of spaghetti code.

If you get to the point that you fear upstream merges/rebases into your WIP, stop for a second and ask yourself if maybe that might be an issue with too much interpendencies inside the code itself. Code should be as close to an directed acrylic graph as possible. (doesn’t count, I was not speaking of git! :b )

A process owned by any user will be able to exploit a userspace vulnerability, whatever this user is. Selinux, chroot, cgroups/containerization add a layer of protection to this, but any vulnerability that bypass these will be as exploitable from nobody as from any other local user. It will protect a user files from some access attempts but will fail to prevent any serious attack. And as usual when it comes to security, a false sense of security is worse than no security at all.

Remember that some exploits exist that can climb outside of a full-blown virtual machine to the virtualisation host, finding a user escalation vulnerability is even more likely.

The only real protection is an up-to-date system, sane user behavior and maybe a little bit of paranoia.

Given this trend, GPT 5 or 6 will be trained on a majority of content from its previous versions, modeling them instead of the expect full range of language. Researchers have already tested the outcome of a model-in-loop with pictures, it was not pretty.

You mean Microsoft will recoup the cost of unbundling by charging more per product compared to the previous bundle, given that it’s now different products?

'cause at work the powers that be has gone all-in on MS and this decision won’t change a bit their “strategy”.

Subjective take: there’s worse than FreeCAD - sure it’s a bit “old school” but it’s bearable. O. The other hand, the solver has crashed on me so many times… The workbench way of doing things requires some time to get usdmed to, sure, but a crashing solver is far worse.

That’s a lot of words for “I’m too lazy to master the most essential tool of my professional life and keep it updated to my requirements”.

If you don’t want to do it, feel free to pay an Ubuntu support subscription, open a ticket, and get back to work. As you said: you should be working on your problem instead of whining. Or maybe you earn more whining?

There’s a saying that goes like that: “To a bad workman, there’s always bad tools.”

EOL of version 7 is next year in June, you got a nice pile of work here!

And *nix shells a perfect example of the KISS principle.

On behalf of garbage, I loudly protest on this attempt to assimilate it to Powershell.

Nice idea! Moreso that despite software-related AI seems to be more and more opensourced, it really looks to me that it’s seriously lacking on the hardware side. Opensource code running on proprietary hardware is a good start, but we’d all be better if it was open and public through and through.