![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://linux.community/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffry.gs%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fc6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
If they’re swiping failed QA chips, it’s easy to swipe a couple boxes at the same time.
If they’re swiping failed QA chips, it’s easy to swipe a couple boxes at the same time.
You’re telling on yourself.
But it’s ok. Lean into it. Embrace your furry side.
Typically being a 90s kid means you experienced the 90s during your formative years. Not that you were born then.
The only thing that can stop a toddler with a gun is a good toddler with a gun
Ok, so you think both are equally bad. That’s fine.
I personally disagree, but that’s because I worry for my daughters and gay friends.
We have a first past the post-voting system and two major parties. You never vote FOR anyone. You only vote AGAINST who you hate more.
Voting third party or not voting is exactly equivalent to voting for whoever you hate most of the top two candidates.
The things I just said are facts. Logically proven. Look up CPG Grey’s FPTP video if you want an easy primer.
So then the question just remains, do you think both candidates are equally horrible? If the answer is yes, then your strategy is correct. But if you think one of the two is slightly more horrible, that’s the one you should be voting against.
Decisions should be made by whomever or whatever is most effective. That’s not even a debate. If the tarot cards were right more often than the judge, fire the judge and get me a deck. Because the judge is clearly ineffective.
You can’t privilege an approach just because it sounds more reasonable. It also has to BE more reasonable. It’s crazy to say “I’m happy being wrong because I’m more comfortable with the process”
The trick of course is to find fair ways to measure effectiveness accurately and make sure it’s repeatable. That’s a rabbit hole of challenges.
I wish cars came in more interesting colors. I’d go magenta.
Ok. So what.
If they can fill the positions at that rate then they should be happy. They can increase prices since consumers don’t tip anymore and pocket the difference.
If you are correct, then the owners wouldn’t be fighting this.
You sound like my management. Hey, we gave you some money yesterday, why isn’t the 10-year-long project done today?
These things ramp up. Modernization takes time. We won’t see the true benefits until 80% of the way through the process.
To be honest, I bet they targeted this one billion just to show some progress. It’s probably not even related to the actual modernization efforts they’re going through. But if they didn’t show some progress, idiots would cut their funding because, like my management and old man dick, political funding has no staying power.
I went with moissanite. It’s sparklier than diamond. My wife still gets compliments on it years later.
Sweet fruit flavored gelatin.
I’ll hold your beer, but I’m not providing an audience.
South Park was funny when it was satire. Then reality got fucked, and south park is just too real now.
“in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!” -Homer
No idea. I just mean “was it worth the effort.”. The phrase itself is older than dirt.
You shouldn’t be proud of a location just because some ditzy cunt squeezed you out on a specific bit of dirt.
Be proud of what you and your neighbors do to improve the place. And if that isn’t enough to be proud of, do better.
Was the juice worth the squeeze?
They still make a percentage of each transaction. But it sure isn’t 18% interest