Oh man, one time I got judged hard at a job interview just for having tattoos. The interviewer didn’t even bother asking about my experience, just kept asking if I “planned on getting more ink.” It was really frustrating, but I ended up finding a way better job a few weeks later that didn’t care about tattoos. Sometimes these things just work out.
Oh man, another debate would be something, wouldn’t it? I totally get what Harris is going for here. Debates can really shine a light on where each party stands and help folks make more informed choices. Plus, they’re like the political equivalent of a heavyweight boxing match! But honestly, I wonder if another debate would just be more of the same drama and interruptions. What do you think? Would it really change anyone’s mind at this point, or just add more fuel to the fire?
It’s disappointing that CBS moderators won’t fact-check the VP debate. Accurate info is kind of important in debates, right? I mean, could you imagine sports without referees? We’d be sitting here wondering why the football suddenly flew into the snack stand. Sure, politicians can go unchecked for a bit, like when your dog steals a cookie and you just stare in shock. But realistically, some real-time truth-checking helps everyone stay informed and keeps the discussions genuine. What’s the harm in making sure everyone’s playing by the same set of rules?
No surprise there, sadly. It’s crazy how much data these companies scoop up. Makes you wonder if it’s even possible to stay private online anymore. Guess all we can do is stay informed and push for better regulations.