• ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 months ago

    Kristi, he’d grind you and every woman up into hamburger and feed it to your surviving dogs if it got him one more vote so he could avoid prison for four more years. Give it up.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    If he chooses a female VP, he will take the blonde with the big tits and personally verified blowjob qualities.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are you suggesting that his idiot lawyer during his trial could give good blowjobs? Because of her skill is a lawyer is anything to go by, she’s not good at anything.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m sure it’s a complete coincidence that her advice happens to be self-serving. Yup, total coincidence.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Last time it was at odds with the presidential candidate. This time they both would fit right in with each other.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    ‘Just pick a woman’ got the Democrats Kamala Harris. Picking candidates based on their sex is not a great idea and is literally the purest definition of sexism.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 months ago

      I by no means love Kamala Harris, but she’s not “just a woman,” she was a strong candidate period.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        You are correct that Kamala wasn’t purely chosen because she’s a woman - she was chosen as a concession to Hillary as she’s her protégé.

        Harris’s checkered past as a prosecutor and lack of communication skills make her an exceptionally poor choice for the executive.

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        She’s not generally popular, she’d get badly wiped on the top of the ticket by pretty much anybody.

        Turnout among black women was very high and very democratic in 2020, she might have been important in making that happen.

            • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              “The reason”? Really? There are no other reasons? Lol. US post-secondary funding is a joke, but within the confines of the US approach if that rule wasn’t in place then no loans would ever be possible for college education since college students typically have few assets anyways and could just declare bankruptcy after graduation. A good reason why forcing young people to take on debt for post secondary education in the first place is stupid, but that rule is what makes the current system, flawed as it is, work to any degree.

              • cerement@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                before the privatization of Sallie Mae, post-secondary education was somewhat affordable in the US (limiting itself more to racial discrimination) – after the privatization, they started raising the rates of student loans, became a collector of student loans, started subsidizing loans offered directly from the institutions which allowed post-secondary institutions to raise their fees through the roof driving people into bankruptcy

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well I mean we already know that he doesn’t like pets and animals hate him. So it would be in character. But he would have to make it a crime somehow for it to really make sense.