silence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoChemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1612file-text
arrow-up1612external-linkChemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square63fedilinkfile-text
In practice, this means 3M is continuing to create harm from the risks they spent decades covering up
minus-squaresilence7@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·edit-24 months agoUnless your well is drawing from an uncontaminated aquifer that isn’t recharged by rainwater, that doesn’t really help you. This class of chemicals wound up pretty much everywhere.
minus-squareMontagge@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up13·4 months agoI was referring to the utilities response not the pollution itself. You’re not wrong.
Unless your well is drawing from an uncontaminated aquifer that isn’t recharged by rainwater, that doesn’t really help you. This class of chemicals wound up pretty much everywhere.
I was referring to the utilities response not the pollution itself. You’re not wrong.