It was nice knowing Raspberry Pi while they lasted. Going to suck losing something that has changed the homegrown embedded system hobby forever.

  • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    Government doing things ≠ socialism.

    Government regulating things ≠ socialism

    Roads and parks ≠ socialism

    Socialism is based in the collective ownership of companies by the workers who make everything happen, rather than execs and managers. Socialism isn’t when government does stuff or when healthcare.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I like how enraged you were that your comment just abruptly ends. It comes off like you were ranting in front of a microphone and got so worked up you walked away mid-rant. Just ranting down the hallway, and down the street…but we don’t hear it, because you’re away from the microphone.

    • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m just going off of the definition here:

      https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

      any of various egalitarian economic and political theories or movements advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.

      We definitely don’t have a pure capitalist economy since that would mean that there is no government intervention in the market.

      And we do have parts of the economy that are owned/run by the government as socialism would suggest.

      What would you call it, if not a mix of capitalism and socialism? Maybe a mix of Capitalism and Communism would be more accurate?

      This article would seem to suggest that: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economy.asp

      • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I would argue that the very means of communist ownership relying on the state means that state capitalism is the means in which communism is reached, and the Soviet Union definitely aligned closer to that, but this is a topic of dispute with scholars.