…blasted those who held up Hezbollah and Hamas flags, both considered terrorist organizations by the United States, as well as protesters who carried a banner saying, “Long live October 7th.”
…one protester said he wished Adolf Hitler “was still here” because “he would’ve wiped all you out.”
So I’m accusing someone of saying something they never said, but it’s apparently okay when you do it.
I mean you substantiated your position several times, unless I was supposed to interpret “More than one. This sounds more like you didn’t read the article.” as anything other than a tacit agreement with the articles sentiment.
If so, feel free to explain.
I’ll explain when you acknowledge you implied I said something I did not say, something you accused me of doing.
Lol, the explanation kinda has a lot to do with determining what you actually meant with your rebuttal.
I took it as defending the premise of the article itself, which was attempting to paint the entire protest as antisemitic in nature.
How else am I supposed to “more than one” other than supporting the article?
I didn’t accuse you of conflating antisemitism and pro Palestine until that particular rebuttal.