• Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    They’re killing Russians, so their historical political leanings don’t really matter.

    • Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, like it never happened thar US weapons send somewhere to fight Russians were then used for even worse purposes Besides, is killing Russians a good thing? I mean fighting back the invasion is necessary, and it will cause deaths in russians troops but we should wish for a minimum of casualties, we are talking about human lives

        • Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Alright alright, promoting killing of people based on their country without bothering giving a reason, i see what type of asshole im talking to

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Without giving a reason? They’re invaders. If they go home they won’t be subject to killing.

            • Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Okay you now have stated a correct reason. I would add two things that can help you refine your way of seeing things :

              • It’s probably best to say ‘kill Russian invaders’ or even ‘kill invaders’, since the problem is invaders and not Russian (I mean, killing random civilians in Moscow wont help Ukraine, but it’s still what you said is good)
              • Insisting on killing is still weird. Killing soldiers is not the goal of fighting an invasion back, it is one way to achieve the real goal : all Russians soldiers out of Ukraine. If that’s what you’re talking about, i advise you to say ‘fighting’ instead of ‘killing’, so it’s not mistaken for a random bloodlust against a country.

              Now I got to apologize if we agree on all those points, I mistook your shortened thinking for blatant stupidity, which would be my bad

  • TheBigBrother@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Whenever I comment on the relationship between that brigade and neo-fascism, someone points out that I am repeating Putin’s rhetoric, so I wonder why there are those who are so interested in dispersing attention from a neo-fascist alliance.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Neo-Nazi Past

    They are still neo-Nazi.

    no evidence the brigade’s members have committed human rights abuses.

    From the same state department that claims there is no genocide occurring in Gaza

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      While I agree on the hypocrisy, there actually isn’t any evidence this unit is a problem. There was a significant reform process that changed much of the leadership and the die hard members left to form another militia unit.

      Personally I find it insulting that it took this long after the reform process to green light this unit while Israel is given a blank check to MICmart.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It would be pretty hypocritical to give a Israel a genocide hall pass and then give Ukraine a full audit. So I’m not surprised.

    Edit to add - Because the comments are already a dumpster fire, let me be clear. The Azov brigade was reformed years ago at this point. I’m mad that they’re still getting this level of scrutiny while we give Israel a pass to treat the Geneva Conventions like a checklist.