Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 14 days agoCheckmateslrpnk.netimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up11.01K
arrow-up11.01KimageCheckmateslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareRBG@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up20·14 days agoIsn’t it normally part of an NDA to not being able to admit you signed one.
minus-squaresnugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up54·14 days agoNot normally, that wouldn’t make much sense. It’s easier to just say you signed an NDA and anyone with sense knows you’re not allowed to talk about the work.
minus-squaremannycalavera@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up22·14 days agoIt’s about Disclosure not Admittance. That would be a NAA. When asked your say: NAA…
minus-squareMonkeMischief@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up26·edit-214 days agoUnless you’re Bruce Wayne, in which case when asked you might say NA NA-NA NA-NA NA-NA NA… I’ll see myself out.
Isn’t it normally part of an NDA to not being able to admit you signed one.
Not normally, that wouldn’t make much sense. It’s easier to just say you signed an NDA and anyone with sense knows you’re not allowed to talk about the work.
It’s about Disclosure not Admittance. That would be a NAA.
When asked your say: NAA…
Unless you’re Bruce Wayne, in which case when asked you might say NA NA-NA NA-NA NA-NA NA…
I’ll see myself out.
Depends