• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    You anti gun people are using the same argument as religious people talking about sex ed. “Should we teach kids how to be safe around guns? No! Just make sure they never ever encounter one!”

    • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The one I linked specifically mentions shooting afterwards for kids as young as 7…

      But yes if guns are at home they should be locked (and really locked, like a trigger lock plus a safe that’s set to something besides 1111, holy crap you’d be surprised at how cavelier some people are) and totally inaccessible to kids. Teaching single digit age kids about guns is not a substitute for that, but of course I’m not saying you shouldn’t teach your kids that they shouldn’t touch guns and what they can do.

      And teaching kids about guns will not solve the serious gun problems in America. The gun problems unique to America that pretty much every other industrialized nation has figured out already. And it’s a horrible tragedy that stuff like “the heroes program” to teach preschoolers how to deal with active shooters is necessary in this country. All to please gun nuts.

      https://www.safekidsinc.com/

      Most gun nuts aren’t too interested in education anyways:

      https://www.thetrace.org/2022/01/which-states-require-firearm-safety-course-concealed-carry/

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        And teaching kids about guns will not solve the serious gun problems in America.

        Ok but it’s still a pretty obviously good idea. Will definitely save lives. Children’s lives.

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Teaching kids to use guns doesn’t save kids’ lives. If you want to teach em to stay away from guns, that they’re deadly, they shouldn’t touch it and should tell an adult right away go ahead.

          Teaching kids to use guns in the name of gun safety is like saying you need to teach them how to drive in case they find some car keys lying around and decide to take it for a spin.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            If you want to teach em to stay away from guns, that they’re deadly, they shouldn’t touch it and should tell an adult right away go ahead.

            That IS gun safety education.

            Also the first rule of gun safety: a gun is ALWAYS LOADED

            • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              Stop for one second, re read the conversation, and the link. I’m criticizing teaching 7 year old kids to shoot, not criticizing teaching actual gun safety. That was a straw man you set up to knock down.

          • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Do you teach your kids to swim, or to stay away from water? Guess which is more effective at preventing drowning?

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Already in the comment, click the links.

          https://www.safekidsinc.com/hero-program-overview

          Here’s where it goes through their curriculum per grade level including pre schoolers.

          The 'heroes" program is not teaching pre schoolers to use guns, it’s teaching them about active shooter situations.

          The other link was the one offering actual gun training (for 7 year olds and up so second graders potentially).

          My comment was that it’s sad we apparently need programs to to teach pre schoolers about how to deal with active shooting situations now.

          • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I don’t see the problem with teaching 7 year olds firearm safety. You’re throwing your credibility out the window by including that.

            Beyond that though, it is sad, but it isn’t a gun problem. Yes, getting rid of guns would get rid of most shootings. However, it wouldn’t deal with the underlying problems causing these incidents, and it wouldn’t help the vast majority of violence in schools. Also, most school shootings, contrary to popular belief, are one or two people, not mass shootings. When our schools are a home to bullies, sexually abusive staff, racially segregated districts (yes, in the 21st century), economically segregated districts, republican defunding efforts, a loss of teachers especially during and immediately post-pandemic, and racially based gangs that perform regular violence against each other, it comes as no surprise, at least to me, that this violence is occurring. If it wasn’t a gun, it would be another weapon. We need to focus on the actual problems, not the ones that make us sad and grab our attention, especially when disarming the populace gives our already authoritarian police state even more power.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m only half joking, because at this point the kids might as well be able to fight back rather than us doing fuck all while countless are fed to the golden throne.