• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Katie Porter just got beat. As much as I love her I don’t know why you think she’d be a strong National candidate when she couldn’t win a state race.

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      She lost because her party backed Schiff. The party is too heavily involved in picking winners during the party to know if a candidate could win a general.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The party did back him, all the more reason she’s not going to be a viable candidate. I’d also point out that just because the party backed him doesn’t negate the fact that the people voted for him.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          The people who vote for Biden will literally vote for anyone. Whether or not anyone voted for Schiff isn’t that strong of an indicator for the general since voter suppression within the Democratic party is much more severe than in the general.

          The party backing a candidate doesn’t mean they’re the best for the general, you’d think Clinton would’ve demonstrated that pretty clearly. In fact, party establishment picks are so anemic that they need to go out if their way to help prop up extremist GOP candidates to make their own guy look more electable. That’s literally their strategy to avoid supporting populist progressive candidates, to roll the dice with fascism.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Well… To be fair there was some shady shit with that race. But put another way, does that mean Schiff would more likely win against Trump than Porter?

      But I tend to agree she’s not quite ready yet.