• linja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If I’m not meant to think about it until understanding emerges, then that means it should be immediately understandable without thinking. It is not.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sometimes it’s better to just accept that you don’t get the joke and move on.

      • linja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I might not find a joke funny, or I might not have the necessary context to appreciate it; that’s “not getting” a joke. If it’s possible to have too much context to appreciate a “joke”, it’s at the expense of people who know more than the audience.

          • linja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            It might seem harmless, but the purpose of a joke is to draw a distinction between those who get it and those who don’t, fostering a sense of community. In this “joke”, the in-group is people who don’t know something; the community ideal fostered there is that knowledge is undesirable, that anything that seems unintuitive to the uninformed mind is inherently ridiculous. The “joke” has no effect if it doesn’t do this. Entertaining the idea without challenge is dangerous.