• tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think I remember reading an earlier analysis that says that Trump has no reason to accept debates with any potential new candidate, as it just gives them more visibility.

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Absolutely. They had no reason to debate Biden again. They sure as shit won’t put him on stage against her, or ANY other candidate.

        • the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          This would be awesome. Give Harris a two hour uninterrupted prime time spot to let the former prosecutor make a case against electing a convicted felon and follow it with 2 hours of the oldest candidate in US history rambling. 😆

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 months ago

      Trump will visibly age on stage like Palpatine from the absolute roasting Harris would do to him

    • DarkGamer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Both candidates are experiencing decline, and if Biden were elected and incapable of doing the job it would have resulted in a Harris Presidency anyway. It’s such an odd thing to object over. We’ve had presidents in decline before and the country kept running just fine, (FDR, Reagan.)

      Biden did a fine job in office, I’m especially proud of his union support, and his policies were spot on in my opinion. To throw him under the bus like this seems really shitty.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Do you think debates are really going to sway voters at this point? Like the people considering Trump don’t already know what a blowhard he is?