• SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s almost like “left” and “right” are bullshit alignments, and instead we have a wide array of stances on different issues; in this case on the tolerance of personal freedom and expression.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s almost like “left” and “right” are bullshit alignments

      Uh… No they’re not. They’re very useful words to refer to a range of ideologies and principles that, although not perfectly defining, make a lot of sense to use.

      and instead we have a wide array of stances on different issues

      That’s why there are subcategories in the left and the right.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Left and right can be useful, but it’s only a single data point. If you get all of your political beliefs from a single data point then you’re an idiot. As with everything, there is more nuance than that. It’s not useless. It just isn’t that encompassing.

      • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Isn’t it the opposite of a data point? Left and right are very broad categories, each of which includes a lot of data points

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, it’s (theoretically) the average position of every position they hold, which is one point. The issue is that everyone values different things in different ways, so it’s not the most useful thing.

          • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t agree that it’s an average as much as it’s a set containing many data points, but sure, just semantics I guess