The number of US cities where first-time homebuyers are faced with at least a $1 million price tag on the average entry-level home has nearly tripled in the past five years, according to new research.

A Thursday report from Zillow indicates that a typical starter home is now worth $1 million or more in 237 cities, up from 84 cities in 2019, underscoring America’s ongoing home affordability crisis.

“Affordability has been strained across the board,” Orphe Divounguy, a senior economist at Zillow, said. “We see the largest number of million-dollar starter homes in expensive coastal markets. We see them in markets with very low homeownership rates and we see them in markets with more building regulations.”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    California?

    (checks notes)

    More than 100 of the 200 are in California. :) Next closest is New York at 31.

    Seems like a mostly California problem.

    • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not just a California problem. It’s a coastal city problem.

      It’s not really shocking. The coast is valuable and limited. Living in an expensive coastal town isn’t really “starter home” material.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        You wouldn’t say that if you saw what they’re selling for a million dollars. House built in the 1940’s with no maintenance except paying off the inspector not to condemn it? Yup that’s a million dollars. Falling into the ocean because of coastal erosion? It has an extra bathroom, it’s 1.5M.

        I joke obviously but I’m not that far off either.

      • ECB@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean, the coasts aren’t really that densely populated. If we build nicer cities there would be plenty of potential space.

        Instead we build shitty suburbs and sprawl, which will always lead to awful, expensive cities

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Systemic issue, California is just showing the rot stronger than other places. It’s a growing issue for the whole country.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      this reminds me of the then they came for me thing. I remember when you could pick up a cheap home if you moved to like iowa. Its not as expensive but its not cheap like before.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I bought my house a year ago and its estimated value has gone up 50% since then (and the estimate isn’t even aware of all the renovations I’ve been doing). It’s meaningless since I bought it for cash and I’m not going to sell it (mainly because I then wouldn’t be able to find any other house to live in for a reasonable price), but it’s kind of nice to know personally even if it is a symptom of an ongoing social calamity.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            don’t your taxes go up if you valutation goes up? I personally want housing in general to just keep up with inflation so I can buy and sell as needed and basically have it hold the value I put into it. If it goes up faster then I might get priced out. Slower and I will lose what I put in.

            • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              don’t your taxes go up if you valuation goes up?

              Not really where I live, anyway. Here, the total tax burden is determined and then the relative burdens are apportioned to individual homes based on their relative values. My home’s value went up because everything in this township went up by about that percentage. It is an incentive against improving your property, though, since if your house’s valuation increases relative to other homes, you will get hit with a bigger share of the total tax burden.

              My township has an additional issue: the local school district is allowed to collect whatever total amount of money they want each year, not subject to approval by the council (and the school tax by far makes up most of the total tax burden). The only thing preventing them from raising the school tax to absurd amounts is that the school board is re-elected every year and too much school tax would get them voted out (most of them get voted out every year anyway, largely because of the school tax as it already stands). I’m not bothered by it because our schools are among the best in the state, and are the primary reason houses here are in such great demand. As a school bus driver, it’s also what pays my own salary.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      I didn’t look at the list, but housing prices are out of control in a lot of places, even if they haven’t hit that $1 million mark yet. A $750k starter home is just as absurd and out of reach for the vast majority of Americans.

      We’re telling young people not to have kids and not to buy homes. And it’s everywhere, not just California.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Texas is getting hit hard because it’s gone from very affordable to super expensive quickly.

      Homes in my area have tripled in cost over past 5 years.