A far-right group funded the case that led to that decision.
  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    5·
    3 months ago

    You mean like putting a divider between urinals? Because that already exists as an option. Then no one can look at your precious little Mr. Happy.

    Trans men generally use a stall anyway, what with usually lacking what they need in order to use a urinal.

    And plenty of cis men also sit down in a stall if they need to urinate.

    So men do have that privacy. Even trans men. The problem here is that you don’t think trans men are men.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      6·
      3 months ago

      You mean like putting a divider between urinals? Because that already exists as an option.

      Sometimes, and even then its usually paltry as an actual intrusion-prevention-device> The funniest is when there is a mirror directly across from the urinals, dividers dont do shit then lol

      Trans men generally use a stall anyway, what with usually lacking what they need in order to use a urinal.

      I know OP is about trans, but Ive not mentioned anything regardging cis/trans because imo it doesnt matter. everyone should have the same right to privacy in a bathroom, therefore gender neutral bathrooms make a lot of sense.

      And plenty of cis men also sit down in a stall if they need to urinate.

      True! But there are inherently less stalls in a mens room BECAUSE of the urinals.

      So men do have that privacy. Even trans men. The problem here is that you don’t think trans men are men.

      Again, this has nothing to do with trans, youre shoving that into my comments.