A state dinner with the U.K.’s king cost the French nearly €500,000.

A decadent dinner costing nearly €475,000 for the U.K.’s King Charles III helped push France’s Élysée Palace — the office of President Emmanuel Macron —to a record high deficit last year.

France’s love for grand gestures and opulent dining are fully in evidence in the pages of a damning  yearly audit of the Élysée’s budget, released on Monday by the Cour des Comptes, France’s top audit court.

The Élysée’s spending, which includes costs related to the president’s diplomatic and presidential duties as well as administration, personnel, security and estate management, reached a whopping €125 million, plunging the books €8.3 million into the red.

Among the biggest deficit drivers were two luxurious state dinners, with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and King Charles III.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldBEnglish
    14·
    3 months ago
    Politico Europe Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    Politico Europe is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: Germany
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politico-europe-bias/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News

    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

      • RCTreeFiddy@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        3 months ago

        Personally, it’s absolutely maddening to see this long ass reply in every thread. I know I can block it, but I choose to downvote instead. Perhaps the bot creator could shorten the reply to a single line and a link?

        Just my $0.02

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldMEnglish
          11·
          3 months ago

          It’s only a long reply because whatever client your using doesn’t parse spoiler tags.

          This is what it should look like:

          Not one line, but also not especially obtrusive.

      • Deestan@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        3 months ago

        I think it rated a news outlet as “moderately credible / left bias” causing some to feel attacked.

        • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.worldEnglish
          5·
          3 months ago

          The usual complaint that I see people bring up is that the people behind it have a pro-Israel bias. But for a quick glance, it’s fine. The issue is that on Reddit, you’d have like 5 bot replies for 1000 human replies, and on Lemmy you’ll have 3 for 15 of the same, so they stand out more. In my opinion, anyway.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comEnglish
            2·
            3 months ago

            My complaint is kind of in this vein. I joined Lemmy to get away from this kind of bullshit. I go to comments to read what other people are saying, not to have a bot shove it’s opinion in my face on literally every fucking thread. Especially if the article has 1 or 2 comments so you go to the comments to see what people are discussing just to find it’s 2 fucking bots, so no discourse is actually happening.

            The bullshit response of “well block it” is actually worse… Cause then you miss any responses made under it. So every time I see it, I just downvote it and move on. I do this with basically every bot I run into on here.

      • snooggums@midwest.socialEnglish
        2·
        3 months ago

        People question the ability for it to be objective due to it being created and run by a single person combined with being an automated process that implies it is authoritative in the context of the communities where the bot is automated.

        I think MBFC is about as good as is available, kind of like Snopes. Both have a history of trying to be objective even if they aren’t perfect.