• EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can 100% guarantee that he absolutely will not accept a loss of any kind ever. He is literally incapable of it.

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 months ago

      The thin silverlining to that scenario is he’s not president/commander in chief and can’t have his goons lower security so his rioters can get in.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 months ago

        What if I told you that his goons still hold plenty of official positions in government security?

      • Icalasari@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Nah. Instead, he has a supreme court that could rule to let it go to the states who would not change who is in charge, thus meaning he gets to win, all on an election challenge saying Kamala cheated

        (I really, REALLY hope the peeps saying this are wrong, I’m Canadian so don’t have the fullest grasp of the intricacies of the US election system and what happens if the Supreme Court sides with whoever claims the winner cheated)

        • batmaniam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Pretty solid. The supreme court only gets a say on a case thst gets to them, which is to say while they have a ton of sway, they’re still a court. Someone has to file a suite, and it has to then be appealed (because neither side in a suite like that is going to NOT appeal). Each time you appeal it moves “up the chain” of a specific judicial circuit. While the circuits were meant to be more of geographical admin thing, the Trump presidentancy saw McConnell absolutely jam pack a circuit with shitty judges. The shenanigans during the document trial with Judge Cannon are a perfect example.

          So they’d have to start with an actual suite. But that could be something as small as “in one polling place we found a Harris sign 99ft from the entrance!” (in the US it has to be 100ft). Normally that would be laughed out of court, but if the judge agrees the judge agrees. Then you appeal, and… Well…

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    He never accepted the last one. No reason to think the next one will be any different. He has said on the record he won’t accept anything other than him winning.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago
    The 19th News Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    The 19th News is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-19th-news/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m afraid there might be an attempt on Harris’ life. Just because everything is weird pro quo with that crowd and they can’t stand being belittled by a lady of color.

    The new head of the secret service better keep their eyes out