• finley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If you actually go to the site, it explains its reasoning

    Also, it doesn’t say NYT, it’s “The Washington Post”, and it’s not “left-wing”, it says “left-center”

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you actually go to the site, it explains its reasoning

      Which disagrees with objective reality.

      Also, it doesn’t say NYT, it’s “The Washington Post”, and it’s not “left-wing”, it says “left-center”

      I was giving an example.

      • finley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Which disagrees with objective reality.

        You’re free to provide evidence and make a counter argument to support this accusation.

        I was giving an example.

        An example of you lying, or an example of the fact you can’t read? An example of what, exactly, since the New York Times is also rated as “Left-Center”, and “left-wing” isn’t even a rating that MBFC uses?

        Please clarify

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Again, left-center is included under the general classification “left wing”, which NYT is absolutely not. Are you being willfully obtuse?

          • finley@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            No. It’s just that I can read. And your opinions have little to do with objective reality.