Gsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoJustice Department considering push for historic break up of Google after landmark antitrust ruling: reportnypost.comexternal-linkmessage-square247fedilinkarrow-up11.25K
arrow-up11.25Kexternal-linkJustice Department considering push for historic break up of Google after landmark antitrust ruling: reportnypost.comGsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square247fedilink
minus-squareMigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·1 month agoWhat about Microsoft and Facebook?
minus-squareandroogee (they/she)@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·edit-21 month agoHow do the people who make this comment every single time something like this happens, expect change when no one’s allowed to be first?
minus-squareAJ1@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·1 month agoMicrosoft already lost an anti-trust suit in 2001. It’s in the article if you care to read it.
minus-squaretrafficnab@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoWe already had first Microsoft anti-trust suit, but what about second Microsoft anti-trust suit?
minus-squareSpaceinv8er@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoNo one reads the articles man. I won’t lie, I’m guilty of it, but it’s mainly cuz Im lazy and go to the comments hoping someone will give a synopsis.
minus-squareSnapz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month ago“They said smugly without an ounce of depth in their argument.”
What about Microsoft and Facebook?
How do the people who make this comment every single time something like this happens, expect change when no one’s allowed to be first?
Microsoft already lost an anti-trust suit in 2001. It’s in the article if you care to read it.
We already had first Microsoft anti-trust suit, but what about second Microsoft anti-trust suit?
Thanks
No one reads the articles man. I won’t lie, I’m guilty of it, but it’s mainly cuz Im lazy and go to the comments hoping someone will give a synopsis.
“They said smugly without an ounce of depth in their argument.”