• LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s always funny to me how people eat up the concept of a distrubuted neural network in tech but scoff at the same idea applying to something like a tree or a fungus.

    Pando is the largest organism by area, and the Humungous Fungus is the largest by mass. The idea that those organisms don’t “think” in some way is laughable.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      “In some way” is doing A LOT of heavy lifting there. … although in the general sense, agreed.

      Especially given how many outright wrong or otherwise assinine conclusions some “thinking” animals come to… Perhaps communicative consciousness is overrated on the intelligence scale.

    • x4740N@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It always seems lime some excuse in a counter response by vеgаns

      The number of times I’ve responded to them telling them that plants probably process pain in a different way to us has always been shot down by them

      Tell them that brains extremely simplified are just on and off responses to certain stimuli / information just like plants have specific reponsonses to stimuli and computers having 1’s and 0’s that respond to information

      A mycelium network could be counted as a brain

      • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you actually believe harming plants causes them pain and that that is bad, you should be vegan. Animal agriculture harms far, far more plants than any plant agriculture ever could.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          But then you’re still causing plants pain by farming and eating them. Isn’t that argument no different than saying if you believe that harming animals causes them pain, you should be in favor of eating the ones that are hunted because farming them causes more pain?

          I really don’t know if plants can cause pain and I think the environmental arguments for not eating meat are far more compelling than the ethical ones, but regardless, I think this is a poor argument for veganism.

          • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            But then you’re still causing plants pain by farming and eating them. Isn’t that argument no different than saying if you believe that harming animals causes them pain, you should be in favor of eating the ones that are hunted because farming them causes more pain?

            If you insist on animal abuse then you should do it through hunting rather than factory farming precisely because of the diminished amount of suffering caused. But it’s still more suffering than would be caused by just eating plants so I’m not sure I understand your point

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m talking about an argument for veganism though. If you are saying that it’s acceptable for people to eat hunted meat, you’re not saying they should be vegans. And you’re encouraging a massive increase in hunting.

              • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                What part of my reference to it as animal abuse sounds like an endorsement of the practice? I’m not sure about you, but personally I consider animal abuse to be unacceptable.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Okay, then I think you’re completely missing my point, which is that arguing that causing less pain is good is a bad argument for veganism. Causing no pain would be the ethical argument, wouldn’t it? Causing less pain would still be unethical, right?

                  It’s sort of like trying to convince someone committing genocide they should stop by telling them they should slow down.

                  • flerp@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    It’s not sort of like that though because the practicality of the matter is that humans have to eat to survive but they don’t have to genocide to survive. Reducing suffering as much as possible being the goal rather than eliminating it completely is not a new concept in philosophy considering eliminating suffering completely is impossible.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll trade you. I’ll read ur book if you check out the ender quintet, or at least speaker of the dead. The hierarchy of foreignness is a concept that has REALLY stuck with me. Also pequininos are bros.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      because humans invent things from scratch that nature has already created and optimzed, it’s why we’re seeing a lot of optimizations on current tech that comes from nature itself.

      It’s a really weird problem to have.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Go find that video of a slime mold optimizing Japan’s rail system by finding oats in a maze

          • LordGimp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            No. The slime mold doesn’t just solve the maze. It figures out the optimal path and grows only where it needs to reach the goal. It’s a fascinating thing to watch in time-lapse. The “water in a maze” idea is that if it fills every passage, the only drain would be the exit.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              obviously, but the flow path of the water is going to be a direct path to the end of the maze also. You just have to wait for it to fill up first lol.