In 2022, the federal government reported that, in samples seized by the Drug Enforcement Administration, average levels of tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC—the psychoactive compound in weed that makes you feel high—had more than tripled compared with 25 years earlier, from 5 to 16 percent. That may understate how strong weed has gotten. Walk into any dispensary in the country, legal or not, and you’ll be hard-pressed to find a single product advertising such a low THC level. Most strains claim to be at least 20 to 30 percent THC by weight; concentrated weed products designed for vaping can be labeled as up to 90 percent.

The high that most adult weed smokers remember from their teenage years is most likely one produced by “mids,” as in, middle-tier weed. In the pre-legalization era, unless you had a connection with access to top-shelf strains such as Purple Haze and Sour Diesel, you probably had to settle for mids (or, one step down, “reggie,” as in regular weed) most of the time. Today, mids are hard to come by.

The simplest explanation for this is that the casual smokers who pine for the mids and reggies of their youth aren’t the industry’s top customers. Serious stoners are. According to research by Jonathan P. Caulkins, a public-policy professor at Carnegie Mellon, people who report smoking more than 25 times a month make up about a third of marijuana users but account for about two-thirds of all marijuana consumption. Such regular users tend to develop a high tolerance, and their tastes drive the industry’s cultivation decisions.

  • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This article feels like it was written by an old man yelling at clouds. “… Back in my day we smoked mid and we liked it” shakes fist and then uses it as a reason to go back to prohibition. Why can’t we just make it legal and let the free market figure it out.

    Turns out more THC for the buck means people can make a few months supply of edibles out of a few grams. Cost effective!

    • matthewmercury@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is such bad reporting about cannabis that it makes me think The Atlantic probably has very poor standards for all their articles.

      • SoJB@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Leftists have been calling out the Atlantic’s poor reporting for a while now, history just has a weird way of always proving them right.

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’d call it more of an opinion piece than actual reporting or journalism but it’s still dumb.

    • Kroxx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      I do agree with the old man yelling sentiment, but in fairness to the article it has ,imo, become a lot easier to get too high in the last decade. By that I mean becoming uncomfortably high. As a daily user for the last decade I smoke mainly because it has been the only reliable way to help me sleep I’ve ever tried, but I honestly enjoy being high as well.

      I have issues with anxiety though and it definitely is really easy to accidentally overdo it. I’ve seen this sentiment grow in a minor portion of the community.

      Luckily it’s a super super easy fix, add cbd bud. When I was reading scientific lit I saw many journal articles that discussed cbds ability to help with thc side effects. I don’t feel like digging them up right now.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      i think the jump compared to 20-30 years ago is like 10x or something which they are finding very hard to handle.

      also the balance of thc/cbd has changed massively - almost no cbd

      i have noticed that lower thc and higher cbd is more available so i think the free market is catering to the old heads