Deceptichum@quokk.au to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoguess I'll just play with my nutsquokk.auimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up11.04K
arrow-up11.04Kimageguess I'll just play with my nutsquokk.auDeceptichum@quokk.au to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 month agoI assume the people are passionate about grammar, and their corrections have nothing to do with respecting trademarks.
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 month agothat’s even worse! especially because the vast majority of self proclaimed “grammar nazis” (really weird fucking title, guys) don’t know shit about linguistics as a science
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoobligatory Mitchell and Webb https://youtu.be/qmVnr7rsWrE
minus-squaregedaliyah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoNo, that’s Lego. Legos is a large metropolitan city in southwestern Nigeria.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agono, that’s Lagos. Legos is a principle of rhetoric along with pathos and ethos.
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoWhich should be your original comment instead of the trademark thing.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agono, I don’t care if it’s grammatically correct.
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 month agoGreat, doesn’t change the fact nobody is passionate about protecting trademarks as you are saying.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoyes they are, because the word Legos has nothing to do with grammar
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoSo what? Them being wrong about grammar doesn’t change the fact they are speaking about grammar.
minus-squarepyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 month agono they aren’t. they’re talking about a trademark.
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·30 days agoYes, about the grammar of a word that happens to be a trademark.
I assume the people are passionate about grammar, and their corrections have nothing to do with respecting trademarks.
that’s even worse! especially because the vast majority of self proclaimed “grammar nazis” (really weird fucking title, guys) don’t know shit about linguistics as a science
obligatory Mitchell and Webb https://youtu.be/qmVnr7rsWrE
Legos is grammatically correct.
No, that’s Lego. Legos is a large metropolitan city in southwestern Nigeria.
no, that’s Lagos. Legos is a principle of rhetoric along with pathos and ethos.
Which should be your original comment instead of the trademark thing.
no, I don’t care if it’s grammatically correct.
Great, doesn’t change the fact nobody is passionate about protecting trademarks as you are saying.
yes they are, because the word Legos has nothing to do with grammar
So what? Them being wrong about grammar doesn’t change the fact they are speaking about grammar.
no they aren’t. they’re talking about a trademark.
Yes, about the grammar of a word that happens to be a trademark.