Over the past 10 years, rates of colorectal cancer among 25 to 49 year olds have increased in 24 different countries, including the UK, US, France, Australia, Canada, Norway and Argentina.

The investigation’s early findings, presented by an international team at the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) congress in Geneva in September 2024, were as eye-catching as they are concerning.

The researchers, from the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) International Agency for Research on Cancer, surveyed data from 50 countries to understand the trend. In 14 of these countries, the rising trend was only seen in younger adults, with older adult rates remaining stable.

Based on epidemiological investigations, it seems that this trend first began in the 1990s. One study found that the global incidence of early-onset cancer had increased by 79% between 1990 and 2019, with the number of cancer-related deaths in younger people rising by 29%. Another report in The Lancet Public Health described how cancer incidence rates in the US have steadily risen between the generations across 17 different cancers, particularly in Generation Xers and Millennials.

  • leisesprecher@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not just capitalism. I’m from east Germany and you wouldn’t believe how much crap was buried, fumed into the air or pumped into the water in the name of peace and socialism.

    Don’t forget, Chernobyl happened because of a cost saving measure.

    BTW, you forgot alcohol, tobacco, vapes, stress and enforced sedentary lifestyle in your cancer list.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      in the name of peace and socialism.

      That was the false justification because the actual reason was capitalism.

      Don’t forget, Chernobyl happened because of a cost saving measure.

      Cutting costs to make a profit is capitalism - especially when the “externality” is a catastrophe for other people.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Cutting costs to make a profit is capitalism

        And socialism and communism are also dealing with limited resources and thus cutting cost is also something that will come up. It’s not like communism unlocks unlimited resources.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      We’re on Lemmy, every evil in the world is the result of capitalism.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          True. But if you scream “capitalism!” Every time something goes wrong, it calls into question how much critical thought actually went into that.

          • Strider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            True, too.

            I think though the declining health does have a massive connection with capitalism as it enforces a lot of negative impact regarding that.

            Personally I’d not be surprised if the whole adhs “pandemic” is connected to the microplastic invasion of the brain, which of course mostly exists due to big oil, greenwashing of plastics and money.

    • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly the working from home with less walking and more sitting seems like the biggest reason for this since there’s some pretty major dietary differences between all these countries, but they probably have a higher rate of WFH compared to other countries.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        2 months ago

        Read the article. The trend started in 1990, a time where wfh meant assembling ballpoint pens or prostitution.

        • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          “The overall evidence points to lifestyle change," says Shuji Ogino, professor of pathology and epidemiology at Harvard University

          A quote from the article. People were starting WFH well into the 80s. It’s part of a sedentary lifestyle and growing obesity problem. Both of which researchers are pointing to as well as microplastics in our system.

          • leisesprecher@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            No, they didn’t. Especially not in relevant numbers: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1450450/employees-remote-work-share/

            This only starts in 2015 (I was too lazy to research your idiocy), but even then (very very much after the internet was a very relevant factor) we start at 7% and you can clearly see that there was an upwards trend at that time.

            So in short: get your head out of your ass and don’t vomit you unfounded stereotypes and boomerisms on the general public.

            • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              What’s the stereotype you think I’m playing into? 😂

              I literally work from home in the tech sector. I’m a young, fit 30 year old with this exact same set of issues. There’s no problem with WFH, what I’m pointing to is that a sedentary lifestyle which is boosted by people who only walk 5 steps from bed to office (like me) has helped to exacerbate an issue. My parent had work from home days back in the 90s and early 2000s, so we know they existed and started growing, much like this issue with cancer. It’s not because of only WFH, but it’s part of that grouping of a sedentary lifestyle. I think you’re taking my position on that as some sort of attack on WFH, which it isn’t.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Younger generations drink less and use less tobacco than basically any other generation, so that’s probably not it.

      I don’t know what you mean by “enforced sedentary lifestyle,” but young people tend to do activities that don’t involve exercise in their free time: computer use, phone use, video games, etc.

      I think the fact that obesity is up something like 20% since the 90s is probably related. Young people exercise less and eat like shit, which seems pretty related to rectal/colon cancers.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know what you mean by “enforced sedentary lifestyle,”

        Skill issue, I’d argue. May I introduce you to the concept of “working in an office”?