The only reason you’re talking about “nuh-uh-yuh-huh” is because you can’t make a coherent argument beyond that.

Your “point” is grounded in deliberate lies and mischaracterization.

Me: If I see something that’s going to start a house fire, I should try to stop it or put it out, or, failing that, plan around the house fire occuring.

You: Your strategy is for the house to burn down.

In what way is that not a blatant and deliberate lie?