• Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      29 days ago

      Just a note: if your on a x11 desktop waydroid will not work without tinkering

      • FGoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        28 days ago

        Said tinkering is pretty simple actually, just install weston. Weston is a reference wayland implementation that can run inside X11, so you can run waydroid inside weston

        • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          I actually recommend using Niri lately. It’s not super great, but it does support multi-touch, which is major.

          I hope cosmic supports it at some point because cosmic actually supports operating in kiosk mode, and also uses smithay.

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            That’s a fair point, and it’s the Waydroid team’s unquestioned right to use whatever technologies they want to build their software on.

            But just throwing it out as a solution to a general Linux question when there’s a VERY good chance it’s incompatible with major distros is omitting critical information.

            • ryannathans@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              29 days ago

              I’m on pop, with a working wayland for quite some time now. Excuse me fon being out of the loop, but what major distros don’t have wayland support?

              • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                29 days ago

                Just off the top of my head, Linux Mint, which I know because Waydroid is incompatible with the machines I use in my classrooms. Even if it were compatible, unless the lack of global hotkeys has been addressed changing is a non-starter.

                • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  Global hotkeys have been addressed on KDE, but no applications actually support it — one of the reasons being that no other desktops support it. Typical chicken-egg problem.

              • Mwa@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                28 days ago

                linux mint(cinnamon stable ,experimental has some wayland support),mx linux(non kde version but am pretty sure kde 5.27 doesnt have wayland out of the box if they follow debian stable release cycle),antix,debian is what i can get from my head

            • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              28 days ago

              Thankfully nested compositor, while not perfect, work really well for most use cases.

              You won’t get native multi-window support, because I don’t think there are any nested compositors that work like that. There was a project in the past, but I’m pretty sure it’s dead now. However, if you looking for something like a blue stack, it’s alternative where you’re only trying to play one game at a time, then waydroid with a nested compositor will work fine.

              I apologize for the rock writing. I’m using speech 2 text.

        • Mwa@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          29 days ago

          True considering 90% of linux desktops are still x11 only outside of kde and gnome (they use x11 as fallback)

            • Mwa@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              No I mean 90% of desktops support x11 not users

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            It saddens me to see you being downvoted by the Wayland evangelists when it is CLEARLY not a (EDIT: feature complete) replacement for X11 yet. If I could upvote you twice, I would.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              28 days ago

              If only x11 worked well in the first place. But its many flaws are never going to addressed because the developers only work on Wayland

              • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                28 days ago

                I’ll never make the claim that X11 is perfect, but my use case requires features that are either not built into Wayland yet or simply won’t be built into it in the future.

                I’m sure it’s a fine product, but asking me to change my workflow to use it is a non-starter. When it reaches feature complete support of X11 functionality, I’ll consider changing.

                • iopq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  What is the use case that doesn’t work for you? Mine was Nvidia and now it’s working on gnome at least

            • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              28 days ago

              what issues are you having on wayland? I run nvidia+intel and it’s completely fine (way faster on old machines too)

              • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                28 days ago

                It’s not that I have issues - it works just fine in the domain it’s designed for. It’s that the Wayland system does not provide feature parity with X11. I make extensive use of window manipulation using xdotool and wmctrl for my daily use case, and those are both unsupported on Wayland. It’s a fine system for users whose use case fit with its design. It is not a feature complete replacement for X11.

              • Mwa@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                No issues at all ngl I wish all the lightweight desktops supported it :(

                • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  ig support is a big issue but I use sway on old computers and it runs really smooth

                  I get that you might want to stick to your favorite desktop though

              • Mwa@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                No issues at all ngl I wish all the lightweight desktops supported it :(

      • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        For future reference, u can get it working by running “mini” wayland sessions in your X11 sessions using something like weston :3

    • ILikePigeons@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      29 days ago

      It is definitely very performant. However, it was a pain to set up when I first tried to use it. First installing it, then installing an ARM to x86 compatibility layer, and then certifying the device for Google Play to work (which in hindsight isn’t necessary considering that Aurora Store exists.)

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        29 days ago

        Certifying isn’t too bad, I’ve done it 7 of 8 times now probably because I keep nuking my machines

        Why do you need a compatibility layer? It runs x86 lineageos doesn’t it?

        • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          28 days ago

          There are good amount of applications that are only armed. Google actually might be getting an open source arm to x86 emulator/native bridge.

          If they do, then waydroid can include translation directly, but as it stands, there are no open source translators, so it’s not something waydroid can ship.

          • ILikePigeons@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            Yup, pretty much that. I really hope an open source ARM to x86 translation layer will be developed in the future, right now you have to install one of them (libhoudini or libndk) separately.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      Depends on the use case.
      If OP’s main goal is gaming, they’ll likely miss the control remapping features. If the use case is running standard apps, then for sure

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        True, I used bluestacks once or twice and concluded it was bloated and possibly dodgy so never really used it

    • jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      I tried that and it wasnt good. Though I was on windows at the time. So Waydroid is a godsend, its pushy with the licensing which was annoying to deal with.