• Shapillon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Otoh the fruit/veggie dinstinction is from culinary tradition and has nothing to do with botanical sciences.

        • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t particularly mind the culinary fruit/vegetable definition, but feel like sweet fruits/savory fruits/vegetables would have been clearer.

        • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s interesting.

          It’s like how peanuts are legumes and not nuts. But I feel like that makes sense because of the pods.

          • Shapillon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah and they grow in the ground too.

            A distinction that I find more entertaining than the fruit/veggie one is the berry category.

            • blueberry: not a berry
            • blackberry: nuh-uh
            • Strawberry: you’re an accessory fruit
            • banana: yup, totally a berry
            • watermelon: go for it

            That’s nuts

              • Shapillon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                These rules are made by botanists.

                A berry is a fleshy fruit without a pit produced by a single flower containing a single ovary.

                This definition is different from the colloquial culinary one which refers to anything small, growing on a small plant or bush and without a pit.