• Cleverdawny@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      You know, it took until 2003 for Russia to remove leaded gasoline from stations. The Soviets never did it LMFAO

      but nice try

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        EDIT: based on another commenter, OP’s claim isn’t even factual.

        And it took the US until 1996 (after fall of USSR)? Not to mention that it was capitalism (General Motors) that spread the hoax about leaded gasoline being safe, under the guise of scientific research in 1921.

        This is not the gotcha you think it is.

        • Cleverdawny@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          If it was all an evil capitalist conspiracy, why did the communists go along with it? Hmm?

          • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It was not uncovered until much later that this scientific research was in fact a hoax to promote General Motors’ business.

            This is very easily verified with a web search. I would be happy to guide you to specific sources and readings as well.

      • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Did chatgpt not include this or…?

        https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.gatech.edu/dist/a/1473/files/2020/09/sovenv.pdf

        Nevertheless, the Soviet Union took effective action to protect the population from lead exposure; it banned lead-based (white lead) paint and it banned the sale of leaded gasoline in some cities and regions. While leaded gasoline was introduced in the 1920s in the United States, it was not until the 1940s that leaded gasoline was introduced in the Soviet Union (5). In the 1950s, the Soviet Un- ion became the first country to restrict the sale of leaded gaso- line; in 1956, its sale was banned in Moscow, Leningrad, Kiev, Baku, Odessa, and tourist areas in the Caucasus and Crimea, as well as in at least one of the “closed cities” of the nuclear weap- ons complex (6, 7). The motivation for the bans on leaded gaso- line is not entirely clear, but factors may have included Soviet research on the effects of low-level lead exposure (8), or sup- port from Stalin himself (5). In any event, the bans on leaded gasoline in some areas prevented what could have been signifi- cant population lead exposure. In the United States and other OECD countries, leaded gasoline has been identified as one of the largest sources of lead exposure (9, 10). Lead-based paint is another potentially significant source of population lead exposure.

        Bonus: a great example of capital at work,

        Along with a number of other coun- tries, in the 1920s the Soviet Union adopted the White Lead Convention, banning the manufacture and sale of lead-based (white lead) paint (11). In the United States, however, the National Paint, Oil and Varnish Association successfully opposed the ban, and lead-based paint was not banned in the United States until 1971 (12).

        Two generations of Americans.

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      And your point is?

      Please do share an example of industrialization that somehow doesn’t include unforseen negative health effects.

      Go on now, we’ll wait.

      • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        My point is that capital has successfully fought to put lead into American’s blood and lungs for over 100 years.

        • BigNote@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          So in other words you are unwilling to answer the question.

          Got it.

          This is precisely why I say that you aren’t intellectually serious people.

          • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You have one question in your previous comment on the very first line, and it was answered.

            Your statement on the 2nd line doesn’t really make sense, as I don’t think anyone blames people for unforseen negative health effects.

            What people are upset about are the forseen, proven, endemic negative health effects being purposefully spread for over a century.